Dman979

and I missed .12

3/10 You're new here!

You get a 100! Which is great, right? Except you are taking the SAT II Subject Test for physics. Having forgotten to check the "Don't share my test scores" box, the College Board proceeds to send your score to all of the institutions you had mentioned at previous times, even passing mentions which you made- "Oh, cool! That's the School of Mocking!" Seeing your 1st Percentile score, all of the institutions you had applied to summarily turn you away. In a fit of self loathing, you go onto the KSP forums to see who responded to your post. Just when you think things couldn't get any worse, they do. The person who replied to your post holds a Ph.D in Mocking from the School of Mocking, and his post makes you curl up in a ball and cry for your mother– who worked at SETI, and was executed along with the other staff members there. You cry yourself to sleep and drown in your tears. I graduate from the School of Mocking. What could go wrong?

8/10 Looks like you changed your avatar!

How many authors does it take to change a lightbulb? 10. One to change the bulb, and the rest to say "I could have done that!"

Well, shucks. 9/10 Love all the various things, but the stuff at the far left is cut off. Try making it two lines? EDIT: Oh, you need to scroll sideways? I see now.

5/10 the quote at the bottom is cut off.

Actually, yes, I have a dog and a cat: The dog is my pet, the cat is his food supply. SeaPerch is a STEM competition variously sponsored by NAVSEA, ASNE, and some other groups. TUBM is nearly pessing their pants for 1.0.

but 13 was better.

my lord, we were at 52 a few days ago, and now we're HERE!?!? 19

33 yup

33 positive

33 yes yes yes!

Oh no you don't! 34!

Yes, and while I was at it, I landed on Kerbol, too. *sarcasm* TUBM is in a Seaperch underwater ROV competition.

Yes.

34! gtg

66cfvygbhnjklm

yes, 64.

62. Not anything but 62.

Pyromaniacs of the world, ignite!

60 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/Seal_2012.jpg

58 trollololol

53 Actually, I think you didn't see the posts below those 3. Anyway, I think they say that the number Floppster posted was incorrect?

52, woot!