Jump to content

RedParadize

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    866

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by RedParadize

    [1.10.x] Mark IV Spaceplane System (August 3)

    in KSP1 Mod Releases

    Posted

    38 minutes ago, Rho-Mu 34 said:

    OPT mod had similar cockpit with exact same problem and, unless i'm missing something, K.Yeon haven't found way to fix it. Perhaps making docking shaft a separate part would be easiest solution.

     

    Oh and many-many-many thanks for your efforts! NFTech and Mk4 are some top-notch stuff.
     

    Yeah I remember that. I wonder if it would not be possible to animate the docking port orientation so that when its closed it match the cockpit. Might be nasty enough to work.

     

    [WIP][1.8.x] SSTULabs - Low Part Count Solutions (Orbiters, Landers, Lifters) - Dev Thread [11-18-18]

    in KSP1 Mod Development

    Posted

     

    Create a text file and rename it to something like  RemoteTech_SSTU.cfg . It can be place in RemoteTech or SSTU, as you wish.

    Then paste this into it:

     

    Spoiler

    @PART[SSTU_ShipCore_A_SM]:FOR[RemoteTech]
    {
        !MODULE[ModuleDataTransmitter] {}
        
        @MODULE[ModuleAnimateGeneric]
        {
            %allowManualControl = false
        }    
        
        %MODULE[ModuleRTAntenna] {
            %Mode0DishRange = 0
            %Mode1DishRange = 40000000
            %EnergyCost = 0.73
            %MaxQ = 6000
            %DishAngle = 45.00
            
            %DeployFxModules = 8
            
            %TRANSMITTER {
                %PacketInterval = 0.3
                %PacketSize = 2
                %PacketResourceCost = 15.0
            }
        }
        
        %MODULE[ModuleSPUPassive] {}
    }

     

    Range might be off a bit. I didn't play stock in a long time. Also, this is a directional antena, might still need a omni antena if you want to connect to both Kerbin and Mun lander. Easy solution is a passive antenna in the command module itself:

    Spoiler

    @PART[SSTU_ShipCore_CM]:FOR[RemoteTech]
    {
        %MODULE[ModuleSPU] {
        }
        
        %MODULE[ModuleRTAntennaPassive]    {
            %TechRequired = unmannedTech
            %OmniRange = 250000
            
            %TRANSMITTER {
                %PacketInterval = 0.3
                %PacketSize = 2
                %PacketResourceCost = 15.0
            }
        }
    }

     

     

    [WIP][1.8.x] SSTULabs - Low Part Count Solutions (Orbiters, Landers, Lifters) - Dev Thread [11-18-18]

    in KSP1 Mod Development

    Posted · Edited by RedParadize

    Yeah I edited the config. Added one of your wonderfull fairing module and changed the decoupling node to the lower one. That should be good enough for now.

    Oh, another thing, if you do this:

    Spoiler

    MODEL
    {
        model = SSTU/Assets/SC-B-131a-DP
        position = 0, 0.86586, 0
        scale = 0.55, 0.55, 0.55
    }

    The docking port fit the inner ring of the standard Clamp-o-tron docking port, It looks legit to me.

     

    And again another edit:

    Question1: What file I need to edit to change the Intestage Petal Adapter weight ?

    Question2: Does your parachute module take in consideration ground elevation ? Better not land on ground! Can we edit full deployment altitude ?

    [WIP][1.8.x] SSTULabs - Low Part Count Solutions (Orbiters, Landers, Lifters) - Dev Thread [11-18-18]

    in KSP1 Mod Development

    Posted · Edited by RedParadize

    9 minutes ago, lynwoodm said:

    I have a quick question. Did you design these rocket engines (especially the bigger ones) to utilize launch clamps to get off the ground? I tried on several occasions to launch without launch clamps and it just stood there like a smoking log. I think it's something to do with adjusting your engine spacing, because I always use the the F1 series to get off the ground, but most of them are designed for a 7 m rocket. So, i shrink it down a notch to fit a 5 m rocket and i have to adjust the engine spacing to fit the engines under the chosen mount. I got to thinking about part clipping with the engines and tried to avoid that as much as possible and it still stuck to the ground.  

     

    Thats a stock bug, or is not exclusive to SSTU. I had that bug on several occasion, way before I start using SSTU.

    Edit: It might not be related but from my experience, it seem to happen more often with heavy rocket. 

    [WIP][1.8.x] SSTULabs - Low Part Count Solutions (Orbiters, Landers, Lifters) - Dev Thread [11-18-18]

    in KSP1 Mod Development

    Posted

    26 minutes ago, JoseEduardo said:

    in fact... mage, would it be possible to have the Apollo and Orion SM and LAS (although I can't see the Apollo one matching Orion) all size-tweakable but in a pre-set state? like, both SM and LAS could rescale to 3.75m and 2.5m (and later to 1.875m and even 1.25, config-based), but of course, their default size would be the intended one


    That sounds like allot of IVA.

×
×
  • Create New...