Jump to content

oriramikad

Members
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by oriramikad

  1. [IMG]http://i65.tinypic.com/2rwnjtc.png[/IMG]
    [IMG]http://i64.tinypic.com/9u9bvl.png[/IMG]
    Cmon guys -- this thing can go 350 m/s, and I just slapped it together in 15 minutes. It only has 5 parts! What's so hard about breaking 300?

    (I tried vector engines, but they ate up fuel too quickly and were hard to control.)
  2. An air augmented rocket engine! It would have higher thrust and ISP the faster it goes, but inside an atmosphere. Outside of an atmosphere it would behave similar to a standard rocket.

    They should be pretty heavy too. Intakes are heavy.

    o_O Isn't that describing the RAPIER engine?

  3. I have a very similar ASUS laptop, but a couple generations older (i7-3610QM, gtx660m) and I have found the CPU runs at about 80 C and the GPU runs at about 85 C when under load. Ive come to accept these is just normal operating temps

    "Normal operating temps" must vary by laptop/manufacturer, then, because I have a Sager NP8651 (i7 4720HQ, GTX 970M, 8 GB RAM) that runs at 52-56C with KSP on highest settings. IMO, anything above 70C is worrisome.

  4. I never understood why would we need those. IRL planes don't need such things. At least not those I am aware of. Decoupling a part of fuselage of your plane would seriously mess up it's aerodynamics and CoM. Mk2 parts are dedicated for atmo uses. And you want those to take-off and land in one piece. For other stuff you take long cylinders.

    Ah, but this isn't real life -- this is Kerbal Space Program! Isn't that the point? :D More power to the player is a good thing in my opinion.

×
×
  • Create New...