TheRag

Traitor! 1

-98 nopess

-98 nopes

-98 nope

-98 nope!

-88 aw well.

-88 gotcha sucker!

-88 Not today!

Banned for banning someone because of a word.

-70 Rome wasn't sacked in a day!

-72 Let's get out of ground and into space!

-73 You efforts...are in vain.

-73 Yes, the restoration begins!

-75 To the light! Forward!

http://github.com/MrMikeNZ/Space-Shuttle/releases/download/v1.8.0/Space-Shuttle.zip

-77 Stop this descending!

Granted but you can only use him once. I wish for no wish.

You got to glide into the airport... from LEO...by making the correct burn at the right time.

6.4k does not need FAR or RF so you are good on that. However people might play with FAR on 6.4K so to have an option for those guys that do would be welcomed As for the reentry, I can say for the most part the vehicle can survive, there are two problems that still linger, one is that front landing gear hasn't got the buffed up heating so it explodes at about 100,000m, but that can fixed pretty fast. The other problem is that the cargo bay doesn't shield the cargo on reentry, causing payload and docking adapters to explode because of overheating. I have three reason why that might be, could be a improper number somewhere that allows heat to pass through, it might be because KSP doesn't see the shuttle as explicit as a cargo hold, over it could be the heating system in KSP in general (though I have Real Heat). Funnily enough those explosions caused Columbia to land in the Gulf of Mexico, though she survived a nice watery landing, yep she ain't coming back. (Pls put the picture above on the FP... need some humor there) I will post this on the official bug tracking for the mod.

Mike, I want to throw in a request. There are some that like Stock scale, there are some that like Real Scale, but there are some who like the middle, and so they resort to the middle. 6.4 size KSP might the Unreal patch be suited to a 6.4x size KSP instead of a cheat?

Well you going to need to post a log, I guess it is related to a NRE flood sounds simliar.

It seems however hovering the mouse away from the toolbars location causes a 50+ percent drop in FPS. However the FPS is restored when the mouse is hovered back over. Strangely enough, using Quick-hide to hide the toolbar seems to restore FPS to a 60 FPS speed. Mouse was moved from bottom to top. I don't know if a Log would help this, but I will provide it Reproduction: Hover the Mouse over the Stock Toolbar for Massive FPS gain, hover away for the FPS tank. In light of this, is there any other way to completely disable the stock toolbar until a solution is found? Quick Hide seems to fail at hiding from time to time. Problem evidence http://imgur.com/a/bZhyK Log https://www.dropbox.com/s/ro6om8684m4g3xm/output_log.txt?dl=0

Alright, I will use RC as workaround. Thanks! Yep, Exception Detector didn't find anything wrong. Problem Workarounded

http://www./download/z0c8hap7can43p6/output_log.txt So something with the parachutes is causing some large NREs per second, any Ideas on this? EDIT: Real Chutes seems to fixes this. Use that if you want the problem to workarounded.

New test results from the RO/RSS department: Launch is great, though SAS likes to make the Shuttle wobble so I won't call that a bug. On orbit operation are good, though I suspect that fuel cell isn't working. Reentry however is impossible, the shuttle's heat tolerance is far to low to even get below 100000m, this could be due the fact that it has a heat tolerance of 1073 degrees and the shuttle has no ablator. Either the heat tolerance of the shuttle must go up or an ablating system need to be implemented.