Tiger98H

I derped! Long time no stock, thanks for the clarification

Hi! I haven't seen this mentioned before, but there is a default 25 rep per Kerbal recovery bonus when using this mod in career mode, which might feel like "cheating" for some players To change this value, go to GameData/CustomBarnKit/default.cfg and find the line "reputationKerbalRecovery = 25" and replace it with any number you want.

@ShotgunNinja Thanks a lot! I also just tested the fuel cell alone and it is functional. Will edit my previous post.

Hi all! I am using Kerbalism with TAC patch in KSP 1.1.3. The fuels cells seem to not function in the background. Edit: fuel cell works correctly on its own. Situation: I have a crewed vessel landed on the Mun that is drilling, converting fuel, using fuel cells and maintaining an EC gain. However, whenever the vessel is unloaded, it loses EC as if the fuel cells are not working. When I load the vessel EC begins to increase again. Any thoughts?

@ShotgunNinjaHi! I noticed that for the Kerbalism-NoLS configuration, the part malfunction system does not work. It seems that the .cfg wrote [EnableMalfuntion] while it should have wrote [EnableReliability]. When I changed it things worked again. Just in case others out there are having the same problem. Also, thank you so much for this amazing mod!

I have Simple Construction, IFS Core and IFS installed via CKAN, all are the latest versions, but the ore tank still cannot carry Metal or Rocket Parts. This mod has very strong potential, so please fix this problem! Thank you

Does anyone think the Mk2 "VA" Command Pod is a bit OP? Currently is weighs ~1.86 tons and hosts 2 kerbals, whereas the Mk2 Lander Can weighs ~2.66 tons and also hosts 2 kerbals. "VA" also has a much higher impact tolerance and heat capacity, not to mention a lower price. Perhaps the only downside is that it has less torque. So when playing I never use the Mk2 Lander Can since the "VA" is better in almost every way I can think of......