AntonioAJC

Richer than Blizzard? This would pretty much happen. Mechjeb users and nonusers would fight each other to the death in the never ending debate, until none are left to keep playing KSP I think that KSP would become rather popular and because of all of these years, the PC modules would be so advanced, that KSP can have things that would've destroyed any old computer!

Watching his videos helped me greatly in KSP. 1. I now know how to build decent rockets. 2. I know how to reach Mun. 3. I know how to make a freaking orbit! 4. I kinda know how to dock? Haven't tried it yet, 'cause I didn't map the controls for moving in docking mode (How do I move left and right?). 5. Thanks to him, I could make my own Mun base copying his methods on landing. Thought it's a little hard since I don't use Mechjeb, but, it's awesome making it manual!

Well, I think that Squad should leave the invention of minerals and elements in KSP to their consumer base IMO. Then they can choose which ones they want to be implemented in the game

I try to ignore them, but I just can't. I'm not saying that I won't play KSP, but the loading screens bug me the hell out. I really hope that Squad can manage to fix this.

Just give the PC a decade or more and the game can render the whole thing.

More parts, female kerbals for variation, and resources that I can work with.

Loved it when the cannon destroyed Mun XD Also, just as the first vid, the way KSP is played as Harvester intended?

It's up to the devs actually.

Awesum, as always.

Re-entry lazors!

Nah, going full vanilla and I personally think that mech Jeb takes away some of the game's experience by letting it do the flying and making maneuvers for you.

Thanks, though I still don't know, did somebody have a craft of his/her to be destroyed by the new landscape?

So, I've ported my save into 0.21 and wanted to check if my Base was destroyed when... IT'S STILL THERE! THIS IS JUST FANTASTIC! For the looks of it, the new Mun landscape didn't destroy any of my ships and probes that I landed there, what a relief! When I switched to some landers and probes, in the beginning when it was loading, it seemed that they were under the ground or partially under. But the ship/probe seems to bump upwards and land safely into the ground. Bill Kerman's still alive people! There was something though, when I switched to a probe, it was up in the air. I guess that a crater was added since my probe began falling and landing in a steep slope. Nevertheless, when the probe hit stable ground, it was ok! How's your Mun base in your port? Was it entirely destroyed or not? Were your probes and landers destroyed?

PFFFFF, you call this art? These are MASTERPIECES!

It was rather obvious just as Asae said, every update breaks some mods, especially save-breaking ones.

They would remove the orbital mechanics and you actually have to keep the engine on to thrust one place to another. Of course, this would be an incentive to buy fuel with actual money so you can at least get to Mun.

It will be hell landing on it now

A mouse and keyboard are good controllers to play KSP. Trust me

Yo tambien hablo Español, soy Panameño, aunque yo prefiero demasiado el Inglez, ya que yo estoy hiendo a una escuela que se habla Inglez.

I wouldn't buy it. I don't care in what way the new update will break saves, just keep updating the original game to make it better! KSP 2 would be really bad IMO, the idea I mean.

538. Add Mass Effect physics, Mass Effect fields in the game and modders can replace Kethane for Element Zero.

Mine's The Kerbal Republic! Victory through unity, loyalty until death! I even made/edited a flag for it

Though would be cool to at least have a pod with those, y'know? Maybe using it so you don't have to put in an RCS tank and some thrusters that would add weight. Though, let's say, career mode, that pod would be expensive.

How come we don't have pods with RCS and thrusters? These would be so cool ^.^ BTW, sorry if there is, but I don't use mods, I go full vanilla.

Exploring the new freakingly beautiful Mun landscape