Jump to content

Oliverm001x

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    221

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Oliverm001x

  1. Oliverm001x
    Deal, we can do it then for 14,750
  2. Oliverm001x
    If you want I can do a future mission, where I can launch numerous satellites (within capacity) to launch a constellation of your cubesats. I could propose that, for a reduced price per satellite.
  3. Oliverm001x
    You struck the deal for the larger one, at least that is what is specified above.
  4. Oliverm001x
    However does the deal stand for the smaller satellite then, as you signed the bigger one? I would take the smaller one for the initial price
  5. Oliverm001x
    I can make it do for 13,000, along with launching the bigger sat in the intended orbit, this is a significant reduction!
  6. Oliverm001x
    I would like to offer my launch vehicle the TOOLV to deliver your satellite to your intended orbit. The details are visible above, at my vehicle unveiling.
  7. Oliverm001x
    Would any PPs be interested in constructing a payload between 0.5-1.5 tonnes for my TOOLV lifter?
  8. Oliverm001x
    My new rocket the "Titanium One Orbital Launch Vehicle" has just been published on the spacecraft exchange thread. With a capacity of 2.2 tonnes, if any payload providers are interested, please specify either here or on the other thread.
  9. Oliverm001x
    Titanium One Orbital Launch Vehicle Images: The TOOLV is a relatively large rocket capable of carrying a variety of satellites ranging from low-high gain payloads. Payload Capacity: 2.2 Tonnes (LKO) Dimensions: Height: 19.1m Width: 2.2m (1.25m diameter fuselage) Length 2.2 meters. Cost to build: 12,090 Reusability: First stage is fully reusable costing 6,940. Cost to use: 15,717 We look forward to launching your payload, if you wish to utilize this launch vehicle please specify so in wither this thread, or the other one! KerbalX link: https://kerbalx.com/Oliverm001x/Titanium-One-Rocket_2
  10. Oliverm001x
    I do not recall a concrete and definitive date, however I propose a minuscule overhaul, being that the LPs can start designing their 1.875 rockets now and post them, securing contracts post-launch and prior to the official "unveiling".
  11. Oliverm001x
    Kerbal Civilization VI
  12. Oliverm001x
    I like the arithmetic above! Great job guys
  13. Oliverm001x
    Is there a plan as to the intended duration of the mission, seeing as this is a manned mission?
  14. Oliverm001x
    The most intriguing thing that might happen in the times to come!
  15. Oliverm001x
    @TheEpicSquared how do you plead?
  16. Oliverm001x
    That would be brilliant! (Is a new idea brewing )? Also:@Brent Kerman The whole purpose of this is that you design we launch, in order to avoid any foul play. If your rocket was not equipped with an antenna, that is not up to @TheEpicSquared to resolve. Now that the problem has been identified, you can go back to the drawing board and add the simple missing part. So TheEpicSquared in my eyes is not accountable for a mistake not made by him.
  17. Oliverm001x
    Successful static fire completed.
  18. Oliverm001x
    MAJOR UPDATE!!! TheEpicSquared and I have proudly concurred on the idea of the Youtube channel idea, and are in the process of revamping it. So ladies and gentlemen, prepare for a new medium, which is video. So you may be wondering, what is going to b on the channel? Well, we will be posting a video of each launch, along with a monthly update revolving around the participant's standings. Thank you for your continuous support! The link for the Youtube Channel is found here!
  19. Oliverm001x
    MAJOR UPDATE!!! TheEpicSquared and I have proudly concurred on the idea of the Youtube channel idea, and are in the process of revamping it. So ladies and gentlemen, prepare for a new medium, which is video. So you may be wondering, what is going to b on the channel? Well, we will be posting a video of each launch, along with a monthly update revolving around the participant's standings. Thank you for your continuous support! The link for the Youtube Channel is found here!
  20. Oliverm001x
    Slightly difficult whilst on holiday...
  21. Oliverm001x
    1. Yes 2. Testing is always a preferred thing to do. 3. Enough to conduct each specific mission + 20% (This is what I would say) 4. Yes, however approximately only 30% lengthwise, for the purpose of bending realism without going into the realm of complete structural integration. 5. & 6. Up to @TheEpicSquared We look forwards to your mission!
  22. Oliverm001x
    Wow, Impeccable
  23. Oliverm001x
    I am going to be "hopping on the bandwagon" so to speak, by making a list of reservations as well... However to make names still available I state that you are only allowed to reserve three names in advance. To keep things more interesting and not have somebody hogging all of the good ones... Anyhow here are my three names: Francium Rutherford Beta
  24. Oliverm001x
    Absolutely, it puts more of a strain and challenge on the hardware
  25. Oliverm001x
    Teaser Image: Titanium One- R&D not completed.... Up soon NOTE: I am not an imbecile and can see that the staging is not correct . (Before the torrent of comments) *cough cough @TheEpicSquared*cough cough....
×
×
  • Create New...