FireKerb

It can't be Science because the panel itself is at 0. Again, I still think it's a mod bug or something.

When did your ship get embedded?

Uh.... Run?

You made a wish. I wish I would make a wish.

This would be much more fitting. Let's just hope it doesn't explode.

The expensiveness was just the salt in the wound. As stated by many others, the danger is the biggest killer.

That looks like a modded solar panel. Stock panels are alot more blue: https://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/File:OX-STAT.png Also the static panel (or any panel, I think) should not have tracking body. Or maybe I'm misremembering.

The video is too grainy. Maybe send a picture of the lander in the VAB. But it's probably a bug.

Firstly, sorry for getting angry. It was just some personal matters leaking into forum stuff. A reverse jet engine, where you get the fuel from the atmosphere and bring your own oxidizer would probably work on Eve, especially considering that the seas are made of explodium.

Now how long do you think it took to get all that knowledge about balloons? A year? A decade? A millennium? Maybe two? If you don't know how hard programming is, don't act like an expert about it.

So how do balloons work in real life? How is the air kept in? Why do they go up? Why do some materials expand but others not? Just because it's not rocket science doesn't mean it's easy.

Making a new engine is easy. All you have to do is plug in a few numbers. Making a new game mechanic is hard. When you have world hunger and war as some of the harder things, that analogy sorta falls apart. And if you don't know how to program, then how do you know how easy it is?

The point is that it's much harder that clicking a button. Such effort is better spent on bugfixing and troubleshooting.

Cool! Now program it into KSP.

How does being in a canyon disrupt communication. And this "cheat" you talk about... if timeWarp = true { move = don't; } If only it were that easy.