[KSP2 should have a space race gamemode against other players.]

yhea this has been confirmed. but i dont think its against random people you have to make a server

[Add Scatter Collision When Colonies Update Drops]

yhea but there is a lot of terrain scatter so it would have an impact on performance. i think it would be better if some planets had rougher terrain. i mean theres no cliffs every planet is basically a hard desert

[KSP Race car ideas?]

dont go that fast and add downforce

 

[Light, Stars and Exposure]

yhea sometimes the reflection and sun is just way to bright aswell. defenetly need this

[Is making a science mod that can add more science part a good idea ?]

would be cool with like a srface scanner that you woulld have to travel a certain distance to scan everything. would add reasons to use a plane or a rover.

[More control over the shape of Procedural wings]

simple planes really alreaddy have the best solution for procedural wings and i think ksp 2 should copy it

[KSP 2 Missions, Main Story Line, Findable Slope Is To Aggressive]

you did research the entire teir one tree with every optionall tech which isnt really necesary. you should have invested it in more essential parts in the second tree. if you spent it better you could easily have gotten autonomous sampling which really speeds up science gains. and you also dont have to do missions. you can just send out science missions yourself.

 

and also

9 hours ago, Stephensan said:

yup amazing, playing about 10 hours, with zero views, its a fashion statement at this point with how little traction I have.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feJoP4WVJp8&t=3697s (im guessing this is you)

idk if you should complain about zero views when you uploaded 2(or 10 according to you) hours of gameplay with no commentary, sorry.

 

 

[Some side missions needs to be more clear. I don't know what to do.]

im guessing its a refference to the april fools kapy space program so i gues you will have to find a statue with a capybara at the ksc. otherwhise i have no idea

[Are you happy that only 7 science collection devices are planned for 0.2?]

On 11/27/2023 at 11:07 AM, Bej Kerman said:

KSP's progression has also been widely criticised and most mods that alter the progression make an effort towards realism.

looking at the tech tree that we have seen in the teaser it actually looks like they are stepping down from realism.  your main reasearch you have to unlock is rocket parts like fuel tanks and engines while you can optionally choose other things like electricity.

 

On 11/27/2023 at 11:07 AM, Bej Kerman said:

The Universe won't start inventing elements just because it's the future, and the point of colonies is to harvest presumably-generic resources so you can launch from other planets.

that doesnt mean that there arent resources only found on certain planets. especially when they can just say that a planet just doesnt have that recource because its their fictional world made for a game to work

[Are you happy that only 7 science collection devices are planned for 0.2?]

On 11/23/2023 at 11:10 AM, Bej Kerman said:

On 11/23/2023 at 10:38 AM, jastrone said:

On 11/7/2023 at 7:34 PM, Bej Kerman said:

On 11/7/2023 at 7:13 PM, dansiegel30 said:

I hope resources for interstellar are only located around Jool

Why not the Mun? There's probably an abundance of hydrogen and helium on its surface.

because that is boring and excrementsty game design

It's realistic, and real space ventures aren't established to hunt for arbitrary elements so I can't say I want to see KSP 2 making specific things exclusive to certain bodies.

ksps proggression has never been about realism.  ksp 2 also takes place in the future and the whole point of colonies is to hunt for arbitrary elements.

[Are you happy that only 7 science collection devices are planned for 0.2?]

On 11/7/2023 at 7:34 PM, Bej Kerman said:

On 11/7/2023 at 7:13 PM, dansiegel30 said:

I hope resources for interstellar are only located around Jool

Why not the Mun? There's probably an abundance of hydrogen and helium on its surface.

because that is boring and excrementsty game design

[This feature would be amazing!]

put the topic in the title

[April Fools Easter Egg!]

On 11/1/2023 at 2:56 AM, Astroneer08 said:

I just thought that some major heads-up would be nice for brainstorming, and coding, and refining the project.

dude, your suggestion was a half hour of work not a project

[April Fools Easter Egg!]

unless you have good suggestions why dont you wait untill its atleast a mont away

[The science is coming. When are the IVAs and all transparent windows going to come though?]

15 hours ago, The Aziz said:

The 1.2 trailer suggests that it won't be this year either.

its not really worthy of its own part in a trailer tho.  but i do think they will add it when the updates now have become more contend adding than bugfixing

[is science just the same as it was in ksp 1?]

5 minutes ago, atomontage said:

That gives me hopes that science will actually require time to perform.

Also modders dug out time constraints for science experiments.
 

data has a clock and a time next to it but samples dont. either you have to wait that long with the sample to get it or thats how long it takes to make a sample but why doesnt the samples  have timers then? but we cant know for sure.

maybe it decays or something?

[is science just the same as it was in ksp 1?]

looking at the latest post

it seems like science will be exactly the same as in ksp 1 with a tech tree and parts that give you science when you go to palces

the only difference that i noticed was that data is divided as either data or a sample that has to be returned to ksc but not much else. did i miss anything or what do yall think?

[Career starting location.]

it should defenetly be in sandbox mode. maybe it starts with selecting if you want to start at the ksc or at a colony.

On 9/16/2023 at 2:08 PM, Barrackar said:

Because there is a huge benefit for new players to all start from the same place: (1) all guides, tutorials, and let's plays are relevant and relatable for new players starting the game; (2) Developers don't have to re-tune the starting experience for every combination of available start location. I.e. every 'option' added to the game requires QA testing of both with, and without, the option enabled. The developers have better things to do with their time at the moment.

 

one way you could get around this would be having to "unlock" it. maybe if you land on a planet you unlock it in sandbox. and if you build a colony you unlock it as a starting location in career.  and I dont really think that much difficoulty tweaking would be needed. if you have the same starting resources you can defenetly get off all planets. getting to other planets might be a little harder but it would always be possible. and to make sure no new player thinks the game is too hard just give every planet a difficoulty. that way you cant blame being to hard if you selected a planet with hard difficoulty

[Altering/repairing existing vessels.]

i mean you will be able to build ships in space stations so it wouldnt be out of the question to change existing ships. but it probably will be like the vab and not like ksp 1 where the ship is simulated while you edit it. 

[A Sketch for Stock LS]

i think a good idea would be making lifesupport only necessary for "colony kerbals". that way you dont really have to think about it earlygame  because you will only be sending out pilots,scientists and engeneers anyways. it would also ad a good use for the ring modules because they would be for colony kerbals while regular pods would be for proffesional kerbals.

and you could have more advanced or simple life support systems depending on difficoulty. lowest would be only having electricity (for the gravity rings) and maybe also something simple like food,oxygen or water while higher difficoulties would require a lot more things and maybe even radiation protection.

[KSP2 part supply limits]

40 minutes ago, cocoscacao said:

1 hour ago, Alpha_star said:

 

As others have pointed out, you can simply fast forward everything, thus making a useless extra step to get on with things.

it doesnt have to be that type of time. it could be that you only have a certain amount per rocket. maybe  it increases per milestone somewhat similarly to ksp 1

[Aerobatics challenge]

 a bit old so i dont know exact dimentions or the speed but this is more of a meme than  an attempt to be good. anyways heres me flying through the tunnel in a tunnel shaped aircraft.

[Failure: Let's get rid of it!]

i think it should be more similar to ksp 1 and maybe the screen appears maybe 3 seconds after all controll points have been destroyed

[Science parts]

i think at least some of the science parts will be in ksp 2 but i dont think they will work the same way.

[how long do you think it will be between roadmap updates?]

On 4/5/2023 at 3:29 AM, Little 908 said:

Actually, if we do a simple calculation:

Say if we get a patch every three weeks, and taking that every three months we get a major update, 4 weeks is around a month (28 days) We will get a roadmap update every 3-ish patch's, meaning the science update, if everything before this is true, will be in the place of patch 3 or 4.

but i think that update will take the longest time.  i think there will be a lot of bugfixingpatches before and after it but later there wont be as many bugs to fix and there might just be one patch between updates.