tetryds
-
Posts
4,725 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by tetryds
-
-
eu acho que se vc tiver em hamachi localhost funciona
e é so pra servidor local, o que eu quis dizer é que parece que o mod tava tendo problema com o endereço
agora se tiver dois servers no mesmo servidor local a chance de dar problema é alta
-
ashuahsuashuasuh o meu é tipo:
-boosters suficientes? -> lançar
-
vc ta usando mods ou so outras texturas?
-
por acaso essa é a versão beta?
porque parece que Minmus ta faltando ali
edit: esquece, acabei de ver o acelerometro
-
eu tambem tava tendo varios problemas pra conectar no meu proprio server usando o ip local
mas dai o "localhost" funcionou
eu prefiro logar pelo ip local pq quando eu era host de minecraft tive uns conflitos usando localhost
-
vou reabrir o server se eu ver que alguem aqui ta interessado
posso abrir pra gringos tambem o problema é que entra muita gente
-
estou sendo host agora
189.123.196.173:2076
pra quem quiser
-
Kerbin and Duna poles could do that
but i belive the ground friction needs a reworking as now it seems its the same for every place with a surface
-
a KSP ring could be just like a lot of scatter, but in orbit
idk if there is any need for it to be collideable
so, no physics for it, they would be just on rails graphics, and our gpus arent doing much on ksp atm
there is no problem in spamming asteroids as scatter into a ring shape
-
i don't see a reason to include all objects into a possible multiple body physics
the simpler solution would be apply it only as several 3-body physics
what im talking about is basically making mun SOIs bigger and adding a 3-Body physics to the object its orbiting
so at Kerbin you feel Kerbol gravity, at Mün SOI you feel Kerbin gravity, etc.
if you make these SOI's big enough you can probably keep the gravitational field error mark low
it's not 8 or 80, there is always a simple and fair implementation
-
Hi there,
I have a bit of a problem here, i'm hosting a server for a few friends, but we cannot see eachothers craft. We can chat, everyone is connected and everyone can play. But we can NOT see eachothers crafts. none at all, only your own.
for settings i have only added the three files that were supposed to be added, as stated in the readme. I have not changed anything else.
Is there something i should change or do?
go 40km away from KSC
-
Also does anyone have any idea why i cant see anyone even when connected to a server with people and syncronized?
Reddit server for example worked for a short while and then everyone vanished from both chat and server and reconnecting does not seem to help..
Same thing with area 51 server.. seems like every server is broken for me now... No one shows up under kerbalmp viewer either even though there are 11 users connected according to status page.
Really odd how it says i am connected and that univese synchronization was successfull and yet i cannot communicate or see anyone. The only thing that shows up on my map view is jeb space center..
i have the same issue
i only get it fixed if i delete the persistent file of my KMP save
but i also wipe the server persistent file when i do that so im not really sure if only deleting KMP persistent save fixes it
-
I think the safety bubble should be replaced by giving players 45 second launch windows in which they have to launch or be recovered, meaning people can meet up at the KSC instead of flying for miles in order to mess around with other players.
i belive it would be more safe to decrease the sphere to 20km or allow the server to control that distance
this way you can have a 2ppl server launching an airplane and rocket whilist seeing each other if you set it to zero
-
Ip: 189.123.199.12
Port: 2076
Make sure you have no mods and the latest client
If it gets too full ill check how many extra slots i can open
nevermind, it was ok but when i left 40km space my ship would warp and head kerbin at unswoopable speed
tried to fix, messed up more
it seems that if people have different saves on their KMP save that messes up
or something like that, idk
waiting for the mod to get stable enough then i host again
-
The only issue i have with instant experiments is that i can't leave my sensors on during a burn or reentry and have that data to vaule something.
-
the server is just too unstable
there are lots of debris on the ksc, which crashes any ship i try to launch
if it does not, no other ships will show up, and if i leave the 40km sphere i blow up
the server should automatically wipe any uncontrolled vessel or debris within the 40km ratius
and please, add a "force sync" button for when im not synced but still within the 40km range
so i wont blow up when i leave it
-
i belive lots of people are trying to log in using mods
please don't
-
yes, you can see each other if further than 40km from KSC
my server is up again
ip: 189.123.199.12
port: 2076
it will be up for about one hour, then it will be back later night
plan on opening it everyday
-
If i click on the launchpad or runway i cannot click any button other than KMP ones, then have to reload the game
-
i see lots of people are disconecting, trying to clean my internet connection as much as possible to see if it fixes
maybe i change the port
-
Im hosting
ip: 189.123.199.12
port: 2076
-
Ah, okay.
It's just about adding a new point system to increment the already running science system
-
Hanoj, i don't belive that would happen.
Since there is the possibility to exchange the points, the only balancing needed would be in the game itself.
Sure there would be some losses on that exchange but it would be also a game balancing factor.
-
Lately some people asked for science points being tiered, there has been also a discussion about some sort of engineering points. Well, at this point (keeping in mind its an unfinished game ofc.) there is this feeling that playing skills are worth nothing other than where you can get the science grind running. I like the science system though, the fact that you are not forced to do anything you don't want to and still be rewarded is great. But, as said above, there is something missing.
My idea is similar to that about Engineering Points (i couldn't find it). The thing is that science and engineering are two separate things, even if interdependent. I purpose a 3-way income management system, which would be a balance of money, science and engineering. These Engineering Points would be tiered and related to what you do whilist playing other than which experiments you run. The tech tree parts are already planned to require money to be unlocked, then they would also require that specific kind of engineering.
But there are people who like to play the game on their own way, for example bringing a rover and making experiments at several biomes nearby wouldnt benefit from engineering nor money income, but a lot of science. To solve that, these three resources would be interchangeable (just like in real life!). It would work like this:
The Science Center of KSP would display 3 options
Tecnology Research - Earns: Engineering Points; Costs: Science Points and Money.
Run Experiments - Earns: Science Points; Costs: Engineering Points and Money.
Develop Private Projects - Earns: Money; Costs: Science Points and Engineering Points (set kind, have a list or earn generic EP).
The game already keeps track of your achievements, and thats exactly what would trigger the EP rewards. Bringing a spaceship back to Kerbin is worth no science after done so many times, but bringing back an interplanetary ship that has a bagage of successful missions or a probe that has orbited for a long time teaches a lot of lessons about how to develop the next ones. At moment, airplanes are worthless until you have enough science and skill for SSTO's, but getting these airplane parts just by running experiments does not make much sense.
Engineering points could be tiered into 4 or 3 kinds:
Rocketry Engineering - Aquired by running engines, orbiting, landing and maybe reaching some place; Unlocks fuel tanks and rocket engines (the Advanced Rocketry part of the tech tree)
Aircraft Engineering - Aquired by flying time, reaching altitude with airbreath engines, landing after using airbreathing engines for some time; Unlocks airbreath engines and aerodynamic parts (the Flight Control part of the tree)
Scientific Engineering - Aquired by sending science data using antennas, running experiments, basically earned together with science in most cases (the Science Tech part of the tree)
Composite Engineering - Aquired by reentry and most ways above, in a balanced ammount; Unlocks more complex pods, structures, separators, fuel ducts, etc (the General Construction and landing gears, rover wheels)
Composite Engineering could fall with Scientific engineering, but that would unbalance the tree setup a bit. There can be also Generic Engineering points, which can be earned by missions or trading off, and would be used to unlock any part of the tree. Some hibrid parts could require more than one EP kind, but that's not really necessary.
The only complaints i can think about this system are that it's not very user friendly, and some people may think that it forces you to play in a way. About user friendlyness, Kerbal Space Program is not an user friendly game yet, the plans (i heard of) are to add more tutorials and documentation to the player, thus minimizing this issue. About forcing the game style, you are going to unlock more stuff for the things you do the most, i belive it will both reward you for your favorite gameplay style, yet encouraging you to explore different manners to play the game as those are needed to unlock the specific parts. At the point the game is now, its basically only giving one option for the player, which i belive is not what the devs want.
Another idea is about how currency will work on the game.
I see two possible ways of implementing the money, via government funding or private company.
When you run a "Government Funding" based space program, the missions you receive aim for scientific exploration, there is a total budget for an aircraft, if you accomplish the mission or return scientific data you increase the next mission budget and receive harder tasks. If you fail too much your budget decreases and you get less budget for the next launch, but also receive easier tasks with higher profit (yey for newbies!). There can be independent budgets for spaceship and aircraft, as well as different missions. Kerbal Kind achievements like landing on another planet are better rewarded. To unlock the tech tree you would require Engineering and Science Points, but no money.
The "Private Company" way would work like a hard mode. Your space program will be aimed for engineering, develop new tech and earn more money. You can take loans at the begin so you can fail some times until you get it running. The achievements aren't so important, but what you do with getting to that place. To unlock new parts you will require Engineering Points, Science Points and Money.
These two modes would satisfy the newbies by leting them learn with the mistakes since they will also get some points when failing. And also the most skilled veterans by offering them a challenge, you want to launch a refuiling station, better be worth it, want to go Duna with a knife and some pieces of bamboo, go ahead!
Tl'dr:
-Add tiered Engineering Points along with the science ones to unlock new parts
-Add two ways of currency (government or private) for normal and more skilled (or not THAT skilled) players
*English is not my main language, sorry for the typos.
Satélite espião
in Portuguese (Português)
Posted
muito legal seu vÃÂdeo
só esse vÃÂdeo ja seria o suficiente pra quem ta começando
tem varios tutoriais porai que querem explicar muito e acabam só atrapalhando, ou querem fazer algo muito simples que não ajuda em nada
vou recomendar seus vÃÂdeos sempre que alguem tiver tendo problemas pra aprender a jogar
eu pessoalmente não gosto do mechjeb, mas é uma boa ideia usar ele so pra circularizar orbitas