Starsky

None.. Awh..

It runs well at 800 x 600, but I'd like to run it at a higher resolution and it just won't do it. It seems to be the shaders that are applied to the ground and water because when I rotate the camera away from the ground it runs entirely lag free. Peculiar.

Hello everyone, I'm confused as to why KSP doesn't run fantastically on my computer. I have a relatively strong processor, Intel i5 @ 2.67 Ghz. I have an adequate amount of RAM, 4GB. But my graphics card is rather out dated and crappy. It's a nVidia GeForce 9500 GT. Which is less than I'd like to have. To run KSP rather lagless-ly? I have to turn all shaders off, and run it at around 800x600 resolution which leaves major black space on my 1920 x 1080 monitor. While watching the game run it takes around ~500MB of RAM, and puts around a constant 12% load on my CPU, yet still lags with any sort of graphical stimulation. Any thoughts on of this is definitely the case, or what cards I should look in to, or any information you could possibly have for me! Thank you, Andrew.

Hello fellow Kerman! My name is Andrew and I am here to learn and grow in my KSP knowledge. I have been playing INTENSELY for the last two weeks or so after purchasing the game, and man is it addicting. One of the few games that I can play hours on end without just doubling over in boredom. About myself? I'm only 15 years of age, which surprises most for some reason. I'm a huge car-fanatic. I'm a self-titled computer guy. I also live in Oklahoma, which makes it difficult to find people that share similar interests in computers and physics. But I digress, anyway, it's very nice to meet all of you and I plan to append and learn from this community!