Peewee

You know if you\'re collecting data because the isa_RAM_Mun_Data.csv file will be created and slowly increase in file size. Try a 3500m*3500m orbit.

Delicious data. New data credit: Innsewerants Thanks again for your data, dvc, pina_coladas, SasquatchM, toastar, and togfox1.

Very nice, but I keep getting format exceptions... Possibly the last several data points don\'t have newlines? It\'s hard to check properly because notepad++ (which I\'ve been using to put all the data in one file) doesn\'t work properly with huge files. Also, could you provide a checksum for the .csv? I got MD5: b7f775ce9833df8fb3988b2d9b7bb8e5 Unhandled Exception: System.FormatException: Input string was not in a correct format. at System.Number.StringToNumber(String str, NumberStyles options, NumberBuffer& number, NumberFormatInfo info, Boolean parseDecimal) at System.Number.ParseDouble(String value, NumberStyles options, NumberFormatInfo numfmt) at System.Double.Parse(String s, NumberStyles style, NumberFormatInfo info) at System.Double.Parse(String s, IFormatProvider provider) at isa_RAM_MapGen.MainClass.Main(String[] args)

Define accurate. Do you mean a data point for every pixel? Then you need 1920x1080= 2 073 600 data points minimum. Of course, you don\'t have to look at the whole map at once. If you want to zoom in 4x and still have a data point for every pixel, multiply by 16 to get 33 177 600 data points minimum. If you define accuracy in terms of square meters (potentially km) represented by each point, then work this out: Points = Area of Mun / area per data point

According to Innsewerants (in IRC) last night, the current method of storing data (lat/long rounded to hundredths) can result in ~12GB of data on the hard drive with no duplicates. However, the current program does not de-duplicate data, it merely appends, so we could theoretically collect the same data point an infinite number of times. We\'ve collected a measly 13MB in what, 2 days? At the current rate that\'s around six years minimum until we\'ve collected all possible data points.

Dat scale ;D

Hehe, can only barely attach it after 7zip.

Added SasquatchM\'s latest data. Now 13823KB total, 685062 measurements. It\'s starting to get hard to tell where data is added on the default map. I count this as a good thing. Thanks again for your data, dvc, pina_coladas, SasquatchM, toastar, and togfox1.

642222 data points / 12961KB

Awesome, another polar orbiter! Thanks again for your data, dvc, SasquatchM, toastar, and togfox1, and extra thanks to pina_coladas.

Thanks again for your data, dvc, SasquatchM, toastar, and togfox1. By the way dvc, does that attachment include your old data, or is it all fresh? I didn\'t notice any repeats at the beginning/end.

More data as usual. Thanks again for your data, dvc, SasquatchM, toastar, and togfox1. edit: Out of date, as usual. Find a more recent post.

This is looking more and more like a map! Thanks again for your data, dvc, SasquatchM, toastar, and togfox1. Edit: Can\'t be bothered linking a more recent data set, find it yourself.

Under the right conditions/settings, apparently 4.2km. Minimum settings except for maximum terrain detail? 3600m tops.

That render is upside down... or is that a glitch with isa_RAM_Mun_Data.exe?!

Updated isa_RAM_Mun_Data.exe output including my first near-polar pass and toastar\'s most recent uploads: Thanks again for your data, dvc, SasquatchM, toastar, and togfox1. edit: removed outdated data, see my more recent post for my data)

I wonder if these maps could replace the Mun\'s texture map for easy visual reference...

... Mine isn\'t a compilation, just the data I collected with 2 satellites in slightly different orbits today. The combined data I had at the time was ~4.5MB.

Moar data for the data crunchers. I also made a map from all the publicly posted data I noticed. (thanks dvc, SasquatchM, toastar, and togfox1) FEATURE REQUEST: Let it use different files than the default. edit: removed outdated map and data, check here for more recent information.

Current progress (MET 18:48:00) (That\'s about 1.4 MB of data by the way) I think I\'ll cross through the equatorial areas at around 3000m, 45 degrees inclination.

Oh boy, a surface map! Running two instances overnight, one at inclination 90.20 degrees, the other at 89.79 degrees. They\'re both at right around 3.5km altitude, so hopefully at least one of them will survive. Oh, and mapping started at 06:40:00 MET.

Can\'t land on Kerbol. I tried (several versions ago). http://imgur.com/a/4bG7Y

For the Jeb competition, do you -have- to land on the mun, or is it optional? If it\'s optional, I\'m fairly certain that this .cfg mod wins by default. http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=8069.0 (accelerates the pod from 0ms to ~5.56 × 10^10 times the speed of light in one physics tick, even if it doesn\'t show \'most gee force\')

Not enough fuel to... What? That should be plenty of fuel to return to Kerbin.

... I certainly thought I had. Whoops. Thanks!