Jump to content

gompasta

Members
  • Posts

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

14 Good

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketry Enthusiast
  1. Easily solved by putting a little finlet on the top of your capsule to raise the CoL. New world requires new thinking. Solve the problems yourself, instead of asking "God" to change the universe.
  2. After seeing all the crying about people who can't handle change, I think we need a change of pace. Personally, I am very much enjoying the new update, and any "problems" people seem to be mostly nit-picking on tiny details, and forgetting that bugs happen and the CTG wont necessarily play the same way you do. WHY DID I START A POSITIVITY THREAD ALL NEGATIVE. I am having a blast with this new update, and I expect any problems to be fixed soon enough. Yep, it isn't easy adjusting to the new aerodynamics model and heating, but I seem to be adapting! Planes are now a lot more fun to fly, and everything feels a lot more real. I haven't progressed in career enough to do the mining and scanning yet, but I am looking forward to putting that to use.
  3. Due to game mechanics, the part is weightless, and the value shown is actually false. This is because small parts are prone to physics glitches when proper collision and weight is applied.
  4. Have you tried running a virus scan? You may have something already on your computer that chrome thinks is KSP. No, the game isn't malware. What AV are you using?
  5. "store.steampowered.c" nope. http://store.steampowered.com/app/220200/
  6. How dare the developers of a ROCKETRY game ignore PLANES. Just kidding, as a current spaceplane builder it would be nice to see some more new parts. The Rapier was a nice addition, but some more stuff would be nice. Im not too fussed though.
  7. That is probably a collision, but what is the worry? It will simply pop out of existence once it hits.
  8. Is this intentional? Is there any practical uses for it? Is there any impractical danny-style uses for it?
  9. I am assuming it is right next to the poles. See the lighter colours?
  10. If they were supposed to be human, then why are they not? The point of the planets being similar to our system is just to make it easier for people to navigate.
  11. Or people could just get it in their heads that kerbals don't have gender. Just because they dont appear female, does not mean that they are male.
  12. I... What... October...Novemb.... WHY DID I THINK OCTOBER WAS BEFORE SEPTEMBER I NEED TO SLEEP GOODBYE.
  13. This is another necro thread. What is going on around here? Albeit not as bad as the others though...
  14. Gear in KSP are not really reliable. If they are at an angle in any way, they have this tendancy to veer. Make sure they are not backwards, or at an angle.
  15. While in stock, there is almost no chance to see it. Minmus itself is only around 2-3 pixels, so duna would only have a very small chance of seeing a single pixel, if the game decides to render it.
×
×
  • Create New...