Gryphorim
-
Posts
337 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by Gryphorim
-
-
Once she's ready to take wing...
http://i.imgur.com/C1zIVtM.png
...gently into that good night we shall not go. (This whole poem has probably been way overused since the film came out...)
It actually has a fourth module docked now, meaning the ring is one third complete. I reckon another day or two and Stargazer will be ready to go
Getting the final docking port to attach is the trick... Mine was skewed just slightly somewhere near the beginning, so by the time I had closed the loop, the last two ports were out by roughly the docking port's radius, and, well.... I used KAS winches to pull it into alignment, and to hold it together once engines were lit, but it didn't go so well at that point, physics said no.
-
Edit: Nevermind, just read posts in other thread.
-
Is there going to be a release of this to suit RoverDude's Alcubierre drive?
-
Hoping to see an IXS Enterprise version of this warp engine. Would it be possible to just do a mesh swap, or is the warp bubble part of the part mesh?
-
Are these functionally the same as a stupidly powerful engine, or do they work like KSPI's Warp drives, preserving angular momentum when shut down?
-
Looks interesting, does it have an integrated heatshield?
-
Loving those large engines and intakes. Is there any chance though, that you could release a version that fits the Mk2 fuselage?
-
Where did you get that nosecone?
-
So I went and saw interstellar, decided to make the Endurance, launched all modules in the ring, assembled most, but the very last docking port in the ring will not connect. Is this a known problem?
Pic for reference:
Thanks everyone for the replies. Alternate designs under investigation.
-
Not using DR, and yes, I get the nyan cat. I did not realise Realchute disabled on x64. It worked fine in .24 x64...
-
Okay, different bug. Seems that every 'chute that uses realchute plugin loses all parachute capability. No staging, no action group option, nothing 'chute related in right click menu. Any ideas?
-
I have been working on importing a selection of meshes from the Interstellar mod into the Nearfuture mod, for use as alternate models of the nuclear reactors.
I achieved this by copying the data from the Nearfuture reactors' .cfg over the .cfg for the Interstellar Antimatter reactor.
Unfortunately, when launching a rocket, anything attached to the nodes on the reactor part disconnect and fall through the rest of the rocket assembly, leaving the rocket unflyable.
I have pored over the .cfg and cannot find why this is happening. Is anyone out there able to help?
PART
{
name = Reactor 25-3
module = Part
author = Fractal
mesh = NewModel.mu
rescaleFactor = 1
node_stack_top = 0.0, 1.2665, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 2
node_stack_bottom = 0.0, -1.2665, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 2
node_attach = 0.0, 0.0, 1.4, 0.0, 0.0, -1.0, 1
// --- editor parameters ---
cost = 660000
category = Utility
subcategory = 0
title = MX-8 Fission Reactor
manufacturer = Kerb Kastria Inc.
description = The MX-8 is a large fission reactor that produces 1.5 MW of electric power.
// attachment rules: stack, srfAttach, allowStack, allowSrfAttach, allowCollision
attachRules = 1,1,1,1,0
// --- standard part parameters ---
mass = 5.4
dragModelType = default
maximum_drag = 0.2
minimum_drag = 0.2
angularDrag = 1
crashTolerance = 8
maxTemp = 4200
breakingForce = 200
breakingTorque = 200
MODULE
{
name = FissionGenerator
UseStagingIcon = true
UseForcedActivation = true
PowerGenerationMaximum = 1500
ThermalPower = 4000
ThermalPowerResponseRate = 35
BurnRate = 0.0000070
MinPowerPercent = 0.2
CurrentPowerPercent = 0.2
MaxCoreTemperature = 400
MeltdownCoreTemperature = 2100
CoreTemperatureResponseRate = 3
CurrentCoreTemperature = 0
PressureCurve
{
key = 0 0
key = 1 10
}
VelocityCurve
{
key = 0 10
key = 500 75
key = 1500 5
}
}
RESOURCE
{
name = ElectricCharge
amount = 1500
maxAmount = 1500
}
RESOURCE
{
name = EnrichedUranium
amount = 280
maxAmount = 280
}
RESOURCE
{
name = DepletedUranium
amount = 0
maxAmount = 280
}
} -
Moved to more appropriate forum. Mods plz delete.
-
Silly question, are the IACBMs supposed to face lights outward?
yep, they are supposed to face outward.
-
Yeah, I've got that. I am using FPSlacker's .cfgs for the stock engines, I am just trying to get this set to have the same effect with atmosphere so all the parts "gel" together aesthetically. I like the new MP effects that you've created, so I'm trying to make that the particle entity that expands.
-
I've been trying to write a .cfg to apply the expansion effects to the Cutter. Inspired by the guys making the B9 pack. Unfortunately I just can't get it to work. I can't seem to make hotrockets excerpt out an existing Module{EFFECTS, and insert a modified version with expansion values.
-
Any chance someone could knock together a quick expanding exhaust .cfg for KW and RLA. I've been trying myself but with no luck.
I've also been trying to adapt FPSlacker's expansion FX to the RAPIER engine, to no avail.
-
Don't suppose a Texture-swapper could be made for Spaceplane+ parts to give them matching textures to these? Also, those Atmo based exhausts look amazing, are they going on the SABRE engines too?
-
That's something you'd have to sort out in the Hotrockets thread, I know Stockalike needs a new config for that anyway.
See, I thought that because this now uses ModuleEngineFX natively, hotrockets is no longer supporting this mod.
-
Is it possible to get alternate Smokescreen .cfg for exhaust expanding with reducing atmo pressure?
-
The one thing I love the most about Hotrockets ATM is the comfig written by FPSlacker, that changes the exhaust plume based on atmo pressure. Will these configs do the same, or can an alternate cfg be made that does?
-
Ah, see, I thought it worked off of the basic Module - EngineFX, but it might be dependant on Smokescreen. In which case I'd have to go over to the guys over at Hotrockets and plead my case there, unless a smokescreen .cfg is in the works here.
-
Do the engine effects scale with atmospheric pressure? Someone over on the Hotrockets thread figured it out recently, and I've been hoping to see it become something of a standard....
-
Made by others doesn't mean you can't make it already
True.... I did want to do something different to the Taurus, but what I will make will be made to the same form factor, to take advantage of Aerojet/SDHI parts like SM, LES and aeroshell.
Also, 3.75m landercan/hitchhikers? Thoughts?
New Mk3 Parts Partially Unveiled
in KSP1 Discussion
Posted
I'm hoping the Cabin lighting gets carried over to existing command pods, habitats and the sci-lab as well. Also the Standard NC and NCS adapter could use an update.