[[1.12.x] TAC - Life Support v0.18.0 - Release 19th Sep 2021]

I, similarly, found Kerbalism was too sprawling, even if it gives you options to turn parts of it off.    Smaller, single purpose mods I find to be better and less buggy.  KH and TAC are both like that.

[[1.12.x] TAC - Life Support v0.18.0 - Release 19th Sep 2021]

10 hours ago, delta5 said:

Haven't played in a long time. What are some must have mods to go along with tac life in a career mode play through?

I find it pairs very well with KerbalHealth to make you build much larger space craft than the base game requires.

[[1.12.x] KRASH - Kerbal Ramification Artificial Simulation Hub (simulation mod for KSP) - Cost settings have been change]

I noticed a minor bug.  The KRASH VAB interface seems to give too low an estimate of sim setup costs (I was using a custom config w/ 5% of parts fixed cost, and 0% for everything else), which can let you launch a sim with a 'limit max cost' setting less than the minimum cost of the sim.  The sim launches and immediately brings up the escape menu.

[[1.12.x] Kerbal Alarm Clock v3.13.0.0 (April 10)]

7 hours ago, releansol said:

With 1.12 I will deinstall this great Mod most likley. Thanks @TriggerAu Without this (and other Mods from you). I where lost

I'm gonna wait and see.  I still find many of the previous mods Squad has brought into the base game preferable to the core implementation (or perhaps I've just gotten used to them).

[[1.12.x] TAC - Life Support v0.18.0 - Release 19th Sep 2021]

7 hours ago, Raptor_1596 said:

Is there a way with stock TAC LS or another mod which will show accurate times for your resources including recycling/growing and not just what you have stored?

I use this mod: 

It has a time readout that shows how long until a resource is depleted/filled at current consumption.

 

 

[KSP Loading...: Kerbal engineers are stepping up their game!]

2 hours ago, basic.syntax said:

Any Career-mode limitations, based on engineer level?  Adding to craft in orbit, could be "overpowered," when combined with part limits, early in Career.

I'm also curious how this interacts with the xp system.  Can y'all share any details there?

[[1.12.x] TAC - Life Support v0.18.0 - Release 19th Sep 2021]

I see this exception repeatedly if I activate a recycler module while in the VAB:

[EXC 21:59:19.833] NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
	BaseConverter.HasSpecialist (System.String effect) (at <c1858a3f77504bd1aaa946fdccf84670>:0)
	BaseConverter.GetCrewEfficiencyBonus () (at <c1858a3f77504bd1aaa946fdccf84670>:0)
	BaseConverter.GetEfficiencyMultiplier () (at <c1858a3f77504bd1aaa946fdccf84670>:0)
	BaseConverter.FixedUpdate () (at <c1858a3f77504bd1aaa946fdccf84670>:0)
	UnityEngine.DebugLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object)
	ModuleManager.UnityLogHandle.InterceptLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object)
	UnityEngine.Debug:CallOverridenDebugHandler(Exception, Object)

 

[[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)]

Looks good, all the displays agree across all KSC and in-flight scenes.

Logs and screens: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/10Vh2SO-NCCtP0JmDXHui9fA89KydZRK3

[[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)]

Tried out the dll, the VAB planner looks like its giving the same exposure value it did in 1.4.6.  The in-flight bananas per day values are different, and vary per kerbal more (there's one 'lead-skinned' kerbal on that flight, but it varies even more than that would explain).  The KH window at KSC gives good values once the vessel has been loaded, but is wrong at first.

Logs and screenshots: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PoTP91u5LNhinyoEo_31EZJD4tlUZC1E

[[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)]

Is it still the ksp.log file you need?  Or is it some other log?

EDIT: log and screen of inflight exposure here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1avQfqR2fUUqwApLkW872ARTsai98Ztrn

[[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)]

Ok, did some testing.  Screenshots, logs and craft files here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bgqQU1jcPRlRA07s6J__M-SDSuitqrJK?usp=sharing

It looks like the vessel in flight has the same level of radiation accrual in both 1.4.6 and 1.5, but there is a difference in the stated exposure in the planner UI in the VAB, and the KH widget in the space center scene and tracking center scene give bad values pre and post vessel load.

EDIT: there is a NullReferenceException in the logs related to TAC.  I see it on both version and believe it to be unrelated to KH behavior.

[[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)]

I've only really noticed it in the VAB/SPH using KerbalHealth's vessel planner, not with in flight vessels (I landed all my crewed flights before upgrading).  Would debug logs from the VAB be helpful?

EDIT: Found a testing save w/ some flights in progress, I'll try to grab some screenshots/logs from 1.4.6 and 1.5

[[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)]

Was there a change to radiation if not using Kerbalism?  I noticed most of my craft have much lower exposure for the same amount of shielding.

[[1.12.x] Dynamic Battery Storage: electrical/thermal planning and timewarp compensation (August 11)]

On 9/13/2020 at 12:31 PM, Lathari said:

Hi,

Anyone else having problems with solar panel simulation in VAB? I can only get any EC from panels if set the distance from sun to 5 Mm, when the efficiency is ~5000%, but if I increase the distance at all, it goes down to 0%. In-flight everything works correctly.

With appreciation.

Same issue.

[[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)]

9 hours ago, garwel said:

They do, but they will only take effect when you load the vessel for the first time after updating.

For the parts with different configs (Lounge vs. Living space), which becomes the default?

[[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)]

Do the changes to command pods/habs apply to already deployed missions?

[[1.10.1] SCANsat [v20.4] -- Real Scanning, Real Science, at Warp Speed! [September 9, 2020]]

Yes, SCAN overlay reappears on all scene transitions it seems.

[[1.5.0 <-> 1.8.1] Kerbalism v3.2]

5 hours ago, Sir Mortimer said:

Yes.

Glad you love it

I also briefly played the 2.2 version, due to naively trusting CKAN.  To me the new science system felt like it cut against one of the things I like about this mod.  Namely that "the need to repeat the same experiment in a situation multiple times has been removed" (from here: https://kerbalism.readthedocs.io/en/stable/science.html#tweaks).  This is especially evident in early career science-ing, needing multiple launches to get a full crew report doesn't feel like the right kind of challenging.

This probably just comes down to balancing the time needed for an experiment to fully complete.  Maybe it should scale with the bodies science multiplier (https://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/Science#Celestial_body_multipliers)?  That way early kerbin experiments are faster, but later outer world experiments are slower.

[[KSP 1.6.1] Stock Visual Enhancements [v1.4.1] [20 March 2019]]

On 4/9/2019 at 11:39 AM, Kilo60 said:

Hmmmm

 

How did you do this specifically?

 

Thanks!

In CKAN, in the Settings Menu, there's an entry 'Compatible KSP versions'.  That brings up a dialog of versions for CKAN to consider 'compatible' with your installed KSP version.  I manually added the version '1.4.9' to the list and checked the box for it in the list.  After that EVE showed as installable, which let me install SVE.

[[KSP 1.6.1] Stock Visual Enhancements [v1.4.1] [20 March 2019]]

On 4/5/2019 at 12:13 PM, Kilo60 said:

Hmmm...

 

Unable to install via CKAN...

 

Any ideas?

I was able to install via CKAN just now

It took some fighting, I had to add 1.4.9 as a compatible version so it would install the right EVE dependency.

[[1.3.0] Kerbalism v1.2.9]

I really like this mod, but I recently noticed that if I try to play a scenario with it installed I'm stuck skipping physics frames (yellow MET clock) and a number of controls don't work.  KSP logs show an exception in the KERBALISM.Reliability.Update() function.  This exception seems to occur every 2-3 milliseconds.

[EXC 21:59:18.739] NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
	KERBALISM.DB.Vessel (.Vessel v)
	KERBALISM.Reliability.highlight (.Part p)
	KERBALISM.Reliability.Update ()

I attached the full logs to a github issue: https://github.com/ShotgunNinja/Kerbalism/issues/124

[I am clearly too stupid to be long range, high altidude plane engineer. Any tips?]

I was using a similar design to get 'high altitude' reports at kerbin. It could cruise at 9-10k pretty easily and then use 'Thuds' to ascend to 20k+ (never hit 70k like that screenshot, probably too much science mass). Post 1.0.3 it can barely reach 5k, and certainly can't cruise there.

I tried swiching to a 2 jet design, and that did improve things, but not quite enough. Cruising altitude is maybe 8k, but the rocket ascent only hit's about 16k since it starts off too low and too slow. Some more tweaks may get it over the threshold, but I'm taking a moment to pour one out for my little 30 part science planes

As a side note, does anyone know what the Wheesley's thrust on the runway was in 1.0.2? In the latest version it seems to top out at 75kN.

[Rolling back to v1.02?]

Someone on reddit pointed me to a fix which appears to have worked! Her it is for anyone interested:

http://www.reddit.com/r/KerbalSpaceProgram/comments/3asi15/uncontrollable_craft_kraken_fix/

I just tried that out, and it seems to work. Craft are controllable again, and Kerbin is its normal non-luminous self.

[1.0.3 Problem? My Space Station is now buggggged out]

I have that bug as well. It's reported on the bug tracker already.

I was able to fix my game with this: http://www.reddit.com/r/KerbalSpaceProgram/comments/3asi15/uncontrollable_craft_kraken_fix/

So far so good, no more stuck physics or glowing fireball planets.

[[1.0.3] Craft in-flight before update, now unflyable (time frozen, controls stuck, display issues)]

On one of the bug reports, they're asking for an un-modded save which is experiencing this bug. Can anyone on this thread upload their's to: http://bugs.kerbalspaceprogram.com/issues/5155