orz
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Posts posted by orz
-
-
...
1.Orz - 50020 points
...
Could you update my score based on the latest entry?
-
Where did you find the the tape recorder?
(Gimme gimme gimme)
It's from the Kerbal Engineer Redux plugin. The part doesn't have any weight, thrust etc, so it doesn't change the behavior of your ship in any way - simply gives you statistics about your rocket, staging, orbit etc.
I also have a reddit thread for the video. An upvote for visibility would be appreciated
-
I believe I can improve my score further! I have the design ready, will test it out tomorrow.
So, I finally got the video ready! Learning Premiere Pro is slow...
OP, consider this my second submission, which should improve my score to 50050
Cheers
-
Yes! i finally could be bothered to add it to the 'allowed parts' list!
Beware the fuel-to-weight ratio though. If I remember correctly, it is even worse for the donut tanks than for the Oscar-B ones...
-
Do it. Do it NOW
Agreed! One of the more entertaining challenges I have tried so far
-
I've done the challenge guys! E1 is me failing, E2 is me overcoming adversity and succeeding.
Excuse my high-pitched, annoying voice. 14 AND PROUD.
EDIT: By the way, it has a mass of 6.207 tons which gives me both of the low-mass bonuses.
I like your design mate. Very clean.
I think you might be better off with fewer engines though. As you said in the video, the small engines are quite powerful, and you end up having to throttle them down to avoid wasting fuel against the air resistance. If you are not using all the thrust then basically you are carrying dead weight.
Try removing 2 of the outer engines and see how high your craft gets then
-
I believe I can improve my score further! I have the design ready, will test it out tomorrow.
-
I was trying to build a rocket to minimus, but my rocket went breakdancing.
Hahaha, I love it! In this game it is often the failures/malfunctions that are most entertaining
-
Does exactly as it says on the tin.
Guidelines:
You have to see the edge of the atmosphere using only stock, 0.625 meter parts.
A larger engine is accepted, so long as it is between 1 - 0.625 meters; same with parachutes.
The less it weighs, the more points you get.
You DO NOT have to orbit. just see space. you will get more points if you do orbit.
Rules:
The only things that are allowed to be larger than 0.625 meters are engines, parachutes and command pods.
You must have an apoapsis of at least 70,000 meters
The ship does not have to be manned. It does not effect points
Video evidence is preferred compared to images. If you have only taken images, just put them in a video. It makes it easier to judge. (Whether the evidence is video or image, it will not effect your score.)
You must have proof you attempted the challenge. It could lead to a disqualification if you don't.
Heres the only cheats or mods you can have: Mechjeb, infinite electric charge. (likely more to come)
Good luck, and as always, have fun
My first post!
I have a submission for the compo. Duna and back again, only stock parts, tiny size.
Total weight of rocket 9.7 Mass Units
I will edit a video later, but posting some screenshots for now as proof:
Cheers
See space on micro-parts.
in KSP1 Challenges & Mission ideas
Posted
Cool design of your satellite! If you add a docking port to it, you could launch one more and get the micro space station achievement
An easy way to see the weight (and other useful stats such as per-stage delta-v and TWR) of your rocket is to install the Kerbal Engineer Redux plugin.