Jump to content

THE META

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

5 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketeer
  1. This is looking to be a very exciting update. I will be playing KSP ALOT after this.
  2. yeah, they should probably make another job for people who make things that aren't rockets, like rovers. that would be pretty cool too.
  3. Yeah I've signed up for this. looks pretty cool and hope to be accepted. Hopefully when MP is fully integrated more things like this will appear, and the community as a whole will be a lot better. This deserves to be a sticky, and if more groups do appear then the concept should have its very own sub forum. This should be heavily supported.
  4. pretty off-topic answer: no, there is no atmosphere for the light to reflect off of, so shafts of light would not be visible.
  5. cos kerbin has no axial tilt, is not wobbly, and the mun has no equatorial inclination and neither dies kerbin, solar eclipses are actually quite easy to see. but still, if those factors weren't there, this would be a very nice and well timed shot. well done!
  6. it was removed to make way for a bigger launch pad, and its never fun for your rocket to explode because it slightly scraped the tower.
  7. Is it just me, or did I see the acceleration of the engine in the upper paragraph at 3.6 KM/S. this seems a bit... un realistic. tell me I'm reading this wrong please.
  8. I fear no planet.... but that... thing. it scares me. I'm not talking about that freak... its not in the kerbolar system is it? one shadows to think the thoughts of sustained cruelty that lie behind those white, contrasting poles...... *whispers* its duna.....
  9. yeah, the devs have said many a time that random failiures are a big no-no, and not many people want them(even though they are in game, unless its just my launch clamps that seem to fail the second they load).
  10. this, my fellow, is known as the nocebo effect, and its not just in people with phobias, its human nature. if you make some one believe in something and that its harmful, they will start feeling the described symptoms. heck, it can even actually KILL people. if you make someone believe that [insert irrational thing here] causes asthma attacks, then there brains will think it does, and when they see that [insert irrational thing here], even though its doing literally nothing to them, they will ACTUALLY begin having a asthma attack. which is why depending on what you say to these people, say, if you said that leaving your head pressed against a wifi causes illness or pain from brain tumours created by the waves and can possibly send you in to a coma, then if they do that then there brain might actually send it's self in to a coma, so you should always word things appropriately when doing these tricks, and it can be done to you as well.
  11. my last manned duna mission, unfortunately the shipe ended up a on polar orbit, and I landed on the sourthen pole. after flag planting and general EVA derping I got back in the ship and took off to rendezvous with the transfer ship. however since I had landed near to the poles my navball was *slightly* messed up, and when following a rough vector that should of brought me in to a intersecting orbit with the transfer ship, I ended up on a 45 degrees inclination to the transfer ship. D'oh.
  12. i'm waiting for whackjobs reply to this thread.... but back on topic, yes I have made a mission to complicated once. it was my duna mission, and I made 3 different parts to it. a contingency ship which would arrive before the rest, which held more fuel for the ship, a transfer module with habitat compartment, which despite the on site fuel, I still felt it nessecary to give it 3 KM/s delta V for once it was in orbit, and a lander module, which was actually not to complicated. evevntually I scrapped the contingency module (however it was already in duna orbit, and although the transfer went well, and also the landing, upon EVA on duna's surface, myengine felt the need to fall off. I was much displeased.
  13. uhhh... I don't see your obvious reasons for showing us this, I've watched the whole video and not one reference to KSP.
  14. holy. those are some nice replicas, however I just hope your infinity is scaled down...... a lot. by about 1m:60m. because the infinity is meant to be 3.5 KM long so..... any way, keep up the good work, they look very good.
  15. you have no Idea what monstrosity you have created greg. you should be jailed for forum-slaughter.
×
×
  • Create New...