sorcerymon

I cant get the docking cameras to work in the latest version. The menus for setting the camera ID on the docking ports do not show up at all.

If the coolers you are talking about are the Sabre Pre-coolers included in B9, you should know that these dont actually do anything. They are purely decorative.

How is the orbiter connected to the EFT? Have you made a your own decoupler for this, or is it just using a stock decoupler?

And you should perhaps also remember that there's a world outside the United States. A lot of people playing KSP speak english as a second language. (I apologize if i'm derailing this thread further)

There's one thing i dont really understand. If some people hate add-ons so much, why do they hang around in the part of the forum dedicated to add-ons?

I may be nitpicking here, but I dont think you should be able to deflate the module while there's crew in it.

For me at least the 0.03.5a parts are having the exact same problem. (that is using the 0.03.5a release in its entirety) So i would think this problem is more likely due to some change made in KSP 0.22

I like the texture style on that new command pod. Will you be using it for all future HOME modules?

Looking at the movie, there appears to be a hatch at the back of the cockpit, at a 45 degree offset to the left from the top. Its only ever seen from the inside though, so its difficult to say exactly where it is on the outside. My guess would be either one of those square panels is the hatch, or its on the narrow bit right behind that.

This is may be a bit unfair, as the threadstarter asked a legitimate question. It is however unnecessary for people to derail it with these "my opinion is the only right one!" replies.

MechJeb can be very useful for testing minor tweaks to rocket designs, since mechjeb can replicate the exact same ascent as many times as you want, something a human could not do. That way you dont have to wonder if that slightly decreased fuel usage was due to improved design or better piloting. And you get more conclusive test results.

I belive you talked about making a shorter version of the node module some time ago, to serve sort of the same function as a stock 6-way adapter. Is this still part of your plan?

I've always imagined Jebediah has a personality similar to the "Space" personality-core from Portal 2.

sumghai, would you consider making a decoupler part for this without the service module?

RLA Stockalike is VERY convenient (since nobody has mentioned it yet). Allows for a lot more flexibility in RCS thruster placement.

Just discovered a very convenient side-effect with the IACBMs. You can use them to place a docking port on the front of a cupola without restricting IVA vision.

Would you take a stab at a stock-like 2-man pod? Something like along the lines of Gemini, only stock-like.

So if i want to roll the spacecraft after i've detached the "service module", i'm basically screwed?

the built-in rcs thrusters on the Gemini pod seem to have zero roll control?