Khobai
Members-
Posts
77 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
99 ExcellentProfile Information
-
About me
CEO of UKSC
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Do you think Life Support should be Vanilla?
Khobai replied to HoloYolo's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
Life support should absolutely be included in vanilla. It should be toggleable on and off though. 1) There should be three critical life support resources: oxygen, water, and supplies (includes food, spare parts, medical supplies, etc). Kerbals should be able to live 3 minutes without oxygen, 3 days without water, and 3 weeks without food. 2) You should be able to produce oxygen from water. You should be able to produce water from fuel cells. Supplies however would only be replenishable from Kerbin. 3) There should be random failures of life support parts that require EVA to repair. 4) Optionally they could add "exposure" to the game. Kerbals would suffer exposure in hostile environments (radiation, extreme temperatures, acidic environments, etc...). The EVA suits could protect Kerbals from several hours of exposure before the Kerbals have to find proper shelter.- 314 replies
-
- update
- life support
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
i make big ship too. patch 1.00 broke it though lol. oh wait i still make big ships XD
-
KAS Floating Cities/Airships - Possible.
Khobai replied to Sharkman Briton's topic in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange
part count limit is still going to be the biggest problem with a floating city. especially if you try to bring other aircraft/ships near it. dont see any way around the part count problem other than using a welding mod -
Yeah but even with armor, a single strong missile could still destroy it. For that reason, armoring is pretty pointless, and a waste of part count.
-
KIDI- Kerbal Interplanetary Defence Initiative
Khobai replied to sodopro's topic in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange
your ship is pretty enough to come to the prom too I uploaded a new version (same download link) that fixes the staging on the i-beam lances You can now fire them in three groups of x4, x4, and x6 instead of them all firing at once. -
thats basically what I use. except if its 0.625 and unguided its a rocket. If its 1.25m or bigger and unguided its a torpedo. if its any size and guided its a missile. And anything that isnt self-propelled is generally considered a railgun
-
KIDI- Kerbal Interplanetary Defence Initiative
Khobai replied to sodopro's topic in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange
Lancer Frigate (Mk2) Main armament: x14 i-beam lances. Auxiliary craft: two light ion fighters (x2 i-beam lances each). Designed for independent deep space operations and patrolling the outer rim planets. Has enough DV to get almost anywhere. link to .craft file -
I-Beam Cannon I-Beam Lance launched from a barrel.
-
KIDI- Kerbal Interplanetary Defence Initiative
Khobai replied to sodopro's topic in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange
That might have been true prior to the addition of the srb-5. But the srb-5 gives fighters a compact weapon that can damage or even destroy most armored ships. I like the way it looks. I think armoring the engines would ruin the aesthetic. Besides adding armor on top of a crash tolerance 6 fuel tank wouldnt help anyway. Armor really only helps if you attach it to crash tolerance 80 structure and even then it doesnt really do anything to stop srb-5s. -
KIDI- Kerbal Interplanetary Defence Initiative
Khobai replied to sodopro's topic in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange
you need a length scale too so you can tell how long the ships are -
KIDI- Kerbal Interplanetary Defence Initiative
Khobai replied to sodopro's topic in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange
either 1) armor bounces small torpedoes in which case you shouldnt use small torpedoes. And if everyone uses large torpedoes, then armor is pointless; or 2) armor doesnt bounce small torpedos in which case armor is pointless. either way armoring is pretty useless like ive been saying all along. it just increases part count and decreases ship performance for no real gain in durability. really what it comes down to whoever gets the first solid hit in. for turn based combat thats usually the lightest ship. A very small and light ship that carries srbs is basically the best ship there is for combat. and no armor usually means youre going to be the lightest ship.