Aliv3

That isn\'t helpful. =P

Excellent work, +1 for you.

I found that with a ASAS module thrown in there that the rocket works perfectly. Maybe you could make a 'Mini ASAS' to go under the parachute, oh and some longer lander legs? Also, I really like this pack and plan to use it for most of my Munar missions. A+++ I didnt even need the lander stage for my last mission, I still had a bunch of fuel left to do a powered landing and still have enough to escape Munar orbit.

Epic. That is all

I love this... full of win and such. I constructed a launch vehicle that flings it on a ballistic trajectory to Mun distance then if left alone it will fall back to Kerbin with full fuel and land. It is the best Mun lander although it tends to bounce apart if you dont slow down enough, maybe turn up the crash tolerance to around 60 or so as the Mun wont have an atmosphere to slow you down so i forsee alot of bouncing crashes

I may be crazy but the RCS doesn\'t fit on the fuel tank, its too small and according to the zip i have all of the pieces yet it feels like im missing one.

A

PEW PEW..

Perfect thank you, i was hoping there would be a tut for 3ds max 2012. Just got my copy and am looking forward to making plenty of explosi.. i mean parts.

http://youtu.be/xBzoBgfm55w Columbus vs Captain Kirk. Epic Rap Battles of History #14

Do want. Nao!

Im just trying to stop all of this. This isnt the thread to argue about measurements and seriously, im trying to control it? i made a suggestion that made this thread extremely off topic and im not supposed to try to stop that? your not debating you arguing that metric is better thats pretty much all that is going on. your all trying to convince each other that metric is best

No offence but learn to read. All of this measurement crap started when i suggested a simple option to switch between the two, then it became a 'whose unit is better' contest

'Here i sit, brokenhearted, thought i had to shit but only farted'- Anonymous scribble in a bathroom stall

B and C

Dude no one said you had to use it. if you even bothered to read you would see i requested as an option. Quit being rude no one said you had to do anything.

Fixed that for you. :

Is it wrong to want to use something im familiar with instead of something that i was given a 5 minute lesson on in the 4th grade seriously i mean come on i just made a simple suggestion that may help a few players if you dont want it dont use it

c

Try smoothing the forehead so it looks less like a green propane tank, the top of the head seems to just \'drop off\' to the face Other than that its awesome and better than anything i could do Make his head into an SRB and put it into the game

Just thought id add a few

My first actually successful *spaceplane with two SRB-self guided rockets. Glides and flies well under low thrust but you can go as fast as you want. Landing is easy under 50m/s Launching the rockets has to be timed perfectly or it will pop off the big wings, only launch if completely horizontal if you are having trouble. Suggestions? Uses C7 Flight Pack, Silisko Industries Doughnut Research & Spacecraft Development Pack, and Sunday Punch\'s RCS module *Does not actually make it to space

Then landed some more......... Then....