Which mods use most RAM?

[That guy what did it]

Hi fellow Kerbonauts,

Would anyone be able to advise me of which mods are particularly high RAM users out of the attached picture of my Gamedata folder?

I have been getting OOM crashes very regularly recently, and I think that the only course of action is to remove some beloved mods.

I am already running on OpenGL with ATM and half res on the ksp settings.

Thanks!!

[Red Iron Crown]

B9, NovaPunch, and KW Rocketry are pretty part-heavy, and thus RAM-heavy (despite using texture trickery to minimize their footprints, it's still a lot of parts). Aside from those I would say EVE (BoulderCo) is a culprit, too.

[michaelsteele3]

The Derby Mod. (Bad-Dum-Tss!)

But really, whichever one seems to be the most complicated in terms of how many parts, and how well-scripted it is.

And can't you see what size a folder is with WinRar?

[That guy what did it]

The Derby Mod. (Bad-Dum-Tss!)

But really, whichever one seems to be the most complicated in terms of how many parts, and how well-scripted it is.

And can't you see what size a folder is with WinRar?

Thanks for a quick response guys,

I can see the size of the folders, but have read that "some mods" can use way more RAM than their size on disk would suggest, but no specifics.

I might try removing EVE as suggested and see how that works.

[Sampa]

Interstellar might also be a culprit as well. I have installed and uninstalled that thing so many times due to space available, it's not even funny!

[Van Disaster]

EVE and well, texture replacer doesn't use anything much by itself, but if you've got some big textures in there they can use a fantastic amount ( although now your image loaded I see you don't have it at all: try installing texture replacer without any textures, it might save a bit by unloading some textures after load ). The worst culprit is squad, try Ven's stock revamp.

I would look at FASA, that's as big as NP + B9 together on my install. I'd also suggest picking one of KW or Novapunch, not both.