Jump to content

Munar Rover with stock parts ... !


Bekiekutmoar

Recommended Posts

Well, I actually managed to fabricate a Munar Rover with currently available stock parts ... ! Its appearance is however a bit odd; squid-like and no wheels.

The first \'version\' of my Munar Rover was made of a capsule, RSC-tank and a number of RSC-thrusters. It turned out the RSC-tank was very fragile and prone to destruction upon contact with Munar surface, even with speeds just around 5 m/s. The brilliant solution was spamming a row of landing legs on the RSC-tank, improving the strength of the improvised Munar Rover dramatically.

The last test was an enormous succes; despite terrible piloting the Rover survived for almost 2 minutes ... !

This design has some drawbacks:

-Capsule is now weak point

-Very hard to control

-Kerbals cannot return to Kerbin

-Still prone to destruction

1ny1ib.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does it work, exactly? does the landing legs propel it?

The Rover is propelled by RCS indeed (hmmm, I saw I typed RSC instead of RCS ... ). The landing legs functions more or less as protection for the fragile RCS-tank. I have yet to figure out some form of protection for the capsule however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just tested rolling a thing like this on it\'s side on the launchpad, and the legs explode when they contact the ground, they need to be extended :(

Maybe 2 RCS tanks would be enough to get you home, but all those legs weighs quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah RCS tank + ground = boom, and so do folded legs + ground.

But, I have a working Munar rover with RCS thrusters as the tires, I have to be careful to land on them and not the tanks, also the top RCS tank tends to break off the top of the capsule and no amount of struts will prevent that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just flew to the Mun again to do another test with the Rover. The spacecraft crashed on the Munar surface due to fuel depletion but the Rover somehow survived. However, I messed up with the controls again and the landing legs couldn\'t absorb an impact with 80 m/s. Looks like my design is a bit flawed ... !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...