Jump to content

skylonesque high performance SSTO


Recommended Posts

What started as a proof-of-concept plane for an SSTO with ISRU capability with the new 1.0 stock refinery and aerodynamics turned out to be a pretty solid SSTO design performance-wise. I present the Carina-Sagittarius heavy SSTO, inspired by the skylon spaceplane concept. It's a 135-ton spaceplane with one long mk3 cargobay and one short mk3 cargobay mounted upside down for fitting a drill inside. Payload fraction is at least 20%, which means one full orange fuel tank weighing 36 tons to 75kmx75km orbit (with almost 1km/s delta-v left after payload separation). Like skylon, it is unmanned. If you want crew, feel free to slap some command pods/passenger modules inside the cargobay. The upside down cargobay would be ideal for extensible ladders too.

Dropbox link to craft file.

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Action groups as follows:

AG1=toggle rapiers

AG2=switch rapier mode

AG3=toggle poodle

The ascent profile is a little complicated. I divide it into 4 phases.

Phase 1: takeoff on rapiers in airbreathing mode. Climb at 20 degrees to 5km.

Phase 2: at 5 km start leveling out to gain speed. If carrying heavy payload turn poodle on. Goal is to hit 450-500m/s. Don't be afraid to lose a little altitude to gain speed if under heavy load.

Phase 3: once rapiers kick into full gear at mach 2, start climbing again at 20 degrees. At 13-15km start leveling out a little again but this time do not lose altitude. Goal is to hit 1200m/s at 20km (1400m/s at 23km with light payload).

Phase 4: above 19km turn on poodle and open action menu of the rapiers. Once the thrust of a single rapier falls below ~150kN, switch them to closed cycle and burn at 5-15 degrees till you hit target apoapsis. Circularize.

With 4 airbrakes re-entry is a cakewalk. Just remember to pump some fuel to the nose to keep CoM in front of CoL. I found filling the second foremost tank (i.e. not the adapter) with whatever is left does the trick. If the plane spins to go tail first you need more fuel in front and if you get no control authority it's too nose-heavy.

I did several test flights up to LKO, with the best figures being 1595 m/s delta-v left after circularizing 75km with the ISRU converter payload, way more than what is needed to land on minmus (mun would be tight). Around 600m/s left with full orange tank payload (36 tons) and 990 m/s after separation. Now that I think of it I should have also written down the delta-v if the fuel in the payload tank were to be used. :P

Also yeah, SSTOs are still possible, still useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! They are precoolers and they provide additional air intake. And they don't blow up. First to go when overheating are the intakes in the front of the nacelles, then front winglets. After that it takes a while but sooner or later the struts will start to melt (at the time I was going 1600 m/s 18km), followed by the big wings shortly thereafter and the whole plane a fraction of a second later. This gave me an idea to replace all air intakes with precoolers to improve very high speed performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it seems big is the answer for SSTOs now, im at 69 tons on mine and it only goes to LKO, +rep this is the first SSTO i have seen that can leave LKO and it can do it with cargo, just awesome

LKO with a small satellite turns out to be relatively easy: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/117025-The-Race-to-Publish-the-First-KSP-1-0-Compatible-Spaceplane-SSTO?p=1881827&viewfull=1#post1881827 :)

Beyond LKO... I haven't a clue xD Maybe Squad intentionally balanced it so that MK2 hulls are short range only, and you have to step up to MK3 for anything more than a light orbital lifter. Definite props to the OP for a big red in 1.0 :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest problem with small craft I found was heat management. See those massive fuel tanks in the front half of the large plane? Very good heat sinks. Small planes' noses/cockpits kept blowing up for me, even with fuel behind them. Large wings also tolerate heat very well, especially ones with fuel in them. Large planes benefit from relatively smaller surface section so less drag, relatively. Third, rapiers have enormous TWR at optimal operating range capable of lifting a lot if kept under those conditions. It is therefore effective to bring a lot of LFO+rockets, squeeze everything out of those rapiers at mach 2-4 and then burn the massive amount of fuel they are capable of lifting to 20km.

Edited by Teutooni
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...