Mk2 Crew Cabin Impact Tolerance

[mike9606]

So I was designing a KAX turboprop powered Mk3 airliner and had a Mk2 Crew Cabin in the tail for "Uber-Economy" Class. After the original design's two PT-100 turboprops proved too weak to keep the aircraft flying I had to ditch it in the sea. I noticed that all of the fuselage survived except for the nosecone and the crew cabin. I checked the parts list and for some reason the crew cabin has a stupidly weak impact tolerance of 6.0 m/s. The cargo bays and inline docking port have a tolerance of 50 m/s, and the cockpits 45. Can anyone tell me why it is like this?

[NathanKell]

I wouldn't say that a part that can survive a crash of 14mph completely unscathed is "stupidly weak"

By contrast, I'd say that a part that can survive an impact of 112mph completely unscathed is...kinda freaky.

[mike9606]

My main issue is just that compared to other parts that you would see along with it on a plane it is much weaker and thus isn't actually viable for aircraft that may have rough landings or something.