Rocket Problem >:(

[CleavelandTheCav]

Hello fellow Kerbalers

My rocket is failing because of unknown problems >

When I take off, only 6 of the bottom rockets activate not the full amount of 25

PLEASE HELP ME AS I AM A NOOOOOOOB

[RC1062]

The others may have broken off. Also, that is far too many ASASs. One is sufficient.

[CleavelandTheCav]

Thanks but what are ASASs

Edit: They are the stabilisers right? I just use them for structural integrity as i am a noob

Edit Edit: I looked at the error report thing and it says that none are broken

[BillWiskins]

If you attach the .craft file (it\'s in the folder KSP > Ships somewhere) then someone wise and knowledgeable will be able to make a clearer diagnosis.

That\'s a heavy rocket, though. I\'d hazard a guess that the linkages between various engines have failed, and the engines have separated \'in place\' rather than actually broken.

[Nibb31]

ASAS are the modules that you have under your capsule. The ASAS is a control computer. You only need one of them, the others are dead weight.

[leopardenthusiast]

The ASAS is a control computer, it makes use of things like RCS thrusters, engines with thrust vectoring, and winglets that have controls. The normal SAS is a stabilizer, it works fine without an ASAS, and you should probably use them where you\'re using ASAS modules. Just keep the one that\'s highest up and it should be fine.

You need to get some decouplers, though, most of those engines are completely wasted there.

[UmbralRaptor]

I\'m guessing that struts and/or vertical snap (toggleable in settings.cfg) will help.

[Knyght]

The main problem is that your rocket is far too big and complicated for anything yet in the game.

[Endeavour]

If you hear the something break, and the engines are greyed out, they probably glitched into the pad. I have that problem, and I use stack decouplers as feet to keep the engines safe

[samstarman5]

Taking the extra SAS parts off should do the trick just for lightening the load alone.

The main problem is that your rocket is far too big and complicated for anything yet in the game.

There is no rocket too big or complicated for KSP. The bigger they are, the more complicated, all the better for the game.

Welcome to KSP. Time to strap on more boosters.

[StellarUniverse]

If your rocket is not stable enough (i.e negative stability), then you used too much ASAS, struts, and engines. It can result in a structular failure.

[CleavelandTheCav]

Ok Ill make some modifications :-[ I feel like a noob but at least i know that its time for more boosters

Edit: YUS The boss mk 3 successfully took off just from me removing the ASASs PHANKS EVERYONE FOR YOUR HELP :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

[samstarman5]

Ok Ill make some modifications :-[ I feel like a noob but at least i know that its time for more boosters

Edit: YUS The boss mk 3 successfully took off just from me removing the ASASs PHANKS EVERYONE FOR YOUR HELP :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Everyone starts as a noob. And multiple ASAS modules aren\'t just redundant, they also end up fighting each other making things worse for your flight.

You learned something important which will help you crash rockets in new ways down the road. Maybe even on the Mun the next time.