Jump to content

The Small Kerbin 2 Challange


Recommended Posts

Red crown I was trying to find your 9th part and couldnt for the life of me until I saw that 1 dam solar panel lol. I bet a million kerbals I would have forgotten that on a low part challenge lol

I may have run out of charge when attempting the challenge with 8 parts. Curse the 909's lack of alternator!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I decided not to try all three categories at once. This one is 6 parts, 112.7t, 44,432 cost. It's also overkill for this mission; my maneuvers were sloppy, I wasted a lot of fuel cherrypicking landing sites, and I actually blew up a bunch of fuel on the kerbin landing.

http://imgur.com/a/JfY9u

It's six parts though. I forgot to ss the mun flag, but I promise it's there. :)

I used KER because I think KSP is boring and tedious without it, and I used Trajectories to show approximate landing zone, because I wanted to land on land without reverting a bunch of times.

Stage 1 got me to almost 2km/s at 100km, so almost in orbit. I had about 5000m/s to play with after that.

After a landing burn, I hit Kerbin at about 20m/s blowing up the engine, then again at about 14m/s, blowing up the fuel tank, and finally the pod "safely" "landed" at about 9m/s. :)

Edit: if this counts for scoring, the ship is called "A Ship Which Was Built for Competing In The Small Kerbin 2 Challange." Do with that as you will.

Edited by Kermen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Multiple launches are allowed, Sum up wight/parts/cost of all launches. All launches helping the mission must be counted."

Impressive landings with incredibly low TWR. How low was it on the Mun?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impressive landings with incredibly low TWR. How low was it on the Mun?

Hi Nich and congrat's for your last mission too ;) Very nice !

From KER on the Mun: Surface TWR 1.25 at start de-orbiting, and 1.29 when landed.

Hard, but not so hard if you keep an eye on the vertical speed, thank's KER :)

Fly safe with Valentina !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a very hard time on the Mun with a lot less weight but I only had 350 m/s in the batteries the the other 250 had to come from solar panels at 1/3 power. I didnt think of watching vertical speed. My craft was right around .72 t when deorbiting for the mun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a very hard time on the Mun with a lot less weight but I only had 350 m/s in the batteries the the other 250 had to come from solar panels at 1/3 power. I didnt think of watching vertical speed. My craft was right around .72 t when deorbiting for the mun

I think I have between 800 and 1000 m/s with 3000 ElectricCharges + the solar Panels, way more comfortable even if the lander is around 1Ton ^^

But I had to F5/F9 at least two or three times lol !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice missions all of you. :)

astrobond, the two flags rule was partly there because that I think reentry in a command seat is silly :rolleyes: So unfortunately that mission will not go on the scoreboard, despite it being a very well flown one.

Kermen, that one will be hard to beat. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice missions all of you. :)

astrobond, the two flags rule was partly there because that I think reentry in a command seat is silly :rolleyes: So unfortunately that mission will not go on the scoreboard, despite it being a very well flown one...

Thank's a lot Nefrums :)

Back to the drawingboard too lol ;)

I have a "less silly" version...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh cool, it counted. :) Let me tell you guys, balancing a 3.75m tank on a poodle on the mun is no easy feat. I probably wouldn't have crashlanded on kerbin if I hadn't wasted so much dV looking for the flattest spot I could find on the mun. 5.2 degree slope. In one attempt, I actually landed the craft sidways and recreated a certain scene from Prometheus trying to make it stop rolling. Had to revert though because I blew up on takeoff. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New entry. 22 parts, 79.1t, 15122 cost. Check out the remaining dV after my final burn. :) Better documented this time.

Javascript is disabled. View full album

That's it for me I think. If someone wants to usurp this design it would not be hard. You could use docking ports for staging and save a tiny bit of cash using Hammers instead of BACCs (albeit twice as many of them) but I just wanted to beat the -current- record, not set an unbeatable one. As for weight challenge... that ion scooter is a thing of beauty and I'm not gonna try to mess with that. I bet you could shave some weight off the fairing (or omit it) and redesign the wings and structural elements, but like I said, that's a work of art, I'm not going to change it. :)

That said, this was a very fun challenge and gave me an excuse to build some really unconventional rockets. Thanks Nefrums!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Again All :)

Arglllll.... You just beat me Nefrums !!! Congratulations, very, very nice mission :)

Here is my new one, with a lot of pictures, I hope i'll be on the second "lightweight" place some minutes xD

Same number of parts, a little less of cost, but 268kg more than you Nefrums !!!

BTW almost the same approach but the vertical takeoff :)

You made a really well tuned ship and perfect flight !!! Not me lol xD

6,263Kg, 32,843cost, 27 parts.

At least this time the two Flags are Ok :)

Here is the Album:

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Fly safe with Valentina :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kermen you are now top on two of the scorebaords, well done.

And anstrobond that was one good mission, I think it was better flown than mine. I think that you might be able to save some fuel by reducing drag with a fairing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.... And anstrobond that was one good mission, I think it was better flown than mine. I think that you might be able to save some fuel by reducing drag with a fairing.

You read in my head lol !!! (maybe this is me who read in your's in fact... xD)

After some testing, here is my new ship:

uFAzIXH.jpg

And you are right, fairing is really more than paying the added weight !

I have to make the mission again, but at this time, in LKO with more than 3500m/s D/V on the mothership, that should be good :)

5,850kg, 31,290cost, 19 parts !

Fly safe with Valentina :)

Edited by astrobond
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you add up each ship's position on each of the three scoreboards, I think your little craft there is the new overall leader. :) Well done!

Thank's a lot Kermen, but you are in the 1st place of the two other scoreboards !!! congrat's too :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done mesklin. i did not know that trick with the picking up flags. There I get for trying to write clever rules :wink:

Nefrums how did you get the chair in the middle like that? I was making a rescue craft and I cant get it to work

There are a few Struts in between the batteries. The Struts are offset down a bit and the chair is plaiced on top of them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...