Jump to content

Apollo 11 in KSP


SmashingKirby148

Recommended Posts

Nicely done. You could use fuel cells instead of solar panels for more realism ;)

Don't worry, Apollo 11 had no rover.

Good thinking! Not only is that a better choice because of your reason, but because I had a load of fuel left in not only the remains of the lander, but the remains of the command pod for the lander. AND the stage that brought my crew back to Kerbin. That would of been a much better decision. XD

- - - Updated - - -

So did Apollo 11. :) The rover wasn't used until Apollo 15.

Oh, ok. Thanks for clearing that up. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...