Jump to content

Delta IV Man Rating


mythic_fci

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this has been discussed before, but I don't see why there's a need to wait until SLS is done when we already have a perfecty good launcher for putting Orion into LEO - the Delta IV? A Delta IV with 1 CBC and 4 GEM-90 strap-on boosters should be able to lift Orion to LEO or to the ISS for flight testing; plus, it could launch commercial vehicles like the Dream Chaser. Finally, it's not like it would take a lot to put everything together - some common Atlas V and Delta IV hardware and software are already undergoing changes for possible human-rating, and the Centaur-Shuttle's technology could be reused to human-rate the Centaur used on the Delta-IV. At most, I'd guess conservatively that we could put someone into space on Orion by 2017-2020 on a Delta IV instead of waiting for SLS to be completed.

 

-FCI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Scotius said. Basically they are still in the technology testing and vetting phase, and because is deals with human life support, these guys are going to take their good sweet time.

This is more the consequence of the Challenger/Columbia disasters than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scotius said:

But there is no push for pressing Orion into service ahead of the schedule. And Dragon is from the get-go built to work with Falcon 9 \ Falcon Heavy - there is no need to refit it to Delta IV.

But there may be a want to make Orion use Constellation's 1.5 Infrastructure- it has its benefits. If so, it's better to spend a little more money to put it on a reusable Falcon Heavy- after all, Delta is a dying rocket brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not trivial. Human rating is mostly about recertifying every component of the rocket. Certification is one of the biggest activities in aerospace engineering, and although some see it as unnecessary paperwork, it is vital to insure that everything is up to standards.

On the pure engineering side, it means more instrumentation, different flight profiles, more instrumentation and telemetry, launch abort systems, crew access and egress systems, and redesigned pad operations. And probably lots of other stuff that I haven't thought of.

It's certainly lot easy, and not something that you want to go through for just a handful of launches.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will it? SLS/ORION will probably launch to the 2040s to 50s (at least it is supposed to), and Shuttle (which costs only $100 million less than SLS, if we take NASA's word for it :P) launched an average of 5 missions a year post- Challenger. The infrastructure is probably one of the main limiting factors for SLS launches though, as LC-39B can only support a maximum of 2-3 launches a year (again, according to NASA). If we assume only 2 of those 3 SLS missions per year use Orion, that means 48 missions (if we assume SLS/Orion dies in 2045- it may actually take longer, if we have a permanent piece of infrastructure in Deep Space that needs to be serviced (like a Moon Base). Not exactly a handful. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fredinno said:

But Delta IV and Falcon Heavy can put one into LEO.

This new quote system enrages me. I'm a big boy I can type

Quote

myself I don't need an overly complex system to do it for me thank you very much. >.< new forums suck.

Anyway... Are they really proposing launching the Orion alone on an SLS in an actual mission? For testing I could understand. But as far as actual missions go surely the Orion will never fly alone on the SLS. It will always be paired with a payload will it not? Like a lander.

What the heck is that?!

... And wth I can't just delete a quote? What is this?! Is this our new "forum"? 

Edited by Motokid600
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fredinno said:

It can use 1.5 launch infrastructure like Constellation.

Can you elaborate here some, Fredinno?

 

Do you mean one launches and then an upper stage is launched later?

 

Maybe provide some particular examples of LVs. DIV and SLS?

 

Can you explain the process for Orion in more detail?

Edited by Bill Phil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh-oh ... what's this? *sniffs the air* .... ahh yes, that's the "neurons operating at nominal efficiency" smell. :) Space, the Sciences, and Engineering are my three favourite things in the world.

knew I'd find a healthy brain-pool here. :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bill Phil said:

Can you elaborate here some, Fredinno?

 

Do you mean one launches and then an upper stage is launched later?

 

Maybe provide some particular examples of LVs. DIV and SLS?

 

Can you explain the process for Orion in more detail?

A 1.5 launch infrasturcture is bascially a 2-launch infrastructure, but where one rocket is much smaller than the other- NASA used it to describe the Constellation Moon Mission Architecture, since for some reason, they didn't want to say that they were actually using 2 launches. B/C reasons.

For example, SLS Block IB would launch first, carrying the transfer stage  and lander for a Moon mission, then a (Reusable) Falcon 9 Heavy, with the actual Orion.

Edited by fredinno
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...