Jump to content

[1.12.x] Kerbal Atomics: fancy nuclear engines! (August 18, 2024)


Nertea

Recommended Posts

  On 12/30/2016 at 6:46 PM, Nertea said:

What overheats - the core or the engine?

Expand  

It's the reactor core that overheats. I got a little frustrated with this, and I've now about forgotten where I was up to, So here's the part config for the Pluto (pulled from MM cache, post-M2X bundled patch) before I messed with it:

  Reveal hidden contents

With this config, I get:
Embedding these is fubar for some reason: https://s23.postimg.org/d1fr21obv/screenshot11.png

I figured it needed exhaustCooling set in FissionFlowRadiator, so I patched it thusly:

  Reveal hidden contents

Now I get: https://s30.postimg.org/5g2cf9b8h/screenshot12.png

Edited by steve_v
Horrible, broken, POS fancy-pants editor. Ate my images. Again. Please kill IPS. Kill it with fire.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For one thing, ditch your Alternator and ModuleActiveRadiator blocks. The first is harmless but you don't need it, the goal of FissionGenerator is to replace that. The additional ModuleActiveRadiator will make things problematic (use the PassiveCooling field of FissionFlowRadiator to simulate an integrated radiator). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/31/2016 at 7:43 PM, Nertea said:

The additional ModuleActiveRadiator will make things problematic (use the PassiveCooling field of FissionFlowRadiator to simulate an integrated radiator). 

Expand  

Yup, that's it :D Much thanks.
Had a feeling this might be causing greif. I guess it was using ModuleActiveRadiator in preference to FissionFlowRadiator, so only getting 5000 energy transfer? In any case, good to know you can't have both on the same part.
The original config's not mine, I'm just trying to fix it. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2017 at 2:46 AM, steve_v said:

Yup, that's it :D Much thanks.
Had a feeling this might be causing greif. I guess it was using ModuleActiveRadiator in preference to FissionFlowRadiator, so only getting 5000 energy transfer? In any case, good to know you can't have both on the same part.
The original config's not mine, I'm just trying to fix it. :wink:

Expand  

Yeah, FissionFlowRadiator was derived from ModuleActiveRadiator, so they will conflict. I don't think this is a huge problem, can't think of cases where you want your dedicated reactor radiator to cool other parts of the ship. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having an odd problem I can't seem to solve. For whatever reason, I can't get the Near Future Electrical patch reactors to generate any heat on the engines. I've had it working a few weeks ago, however now it doesn't seem to work at all. I've tried redownloading both NFE and KA, with no luck, as well as creating a stock copy of the game and installing only those two mods in a clean save. Still no luck. I'm wondering what else I haven't tried yet that I could be missing.

I should add that NFE reactors are working fine on their own, the problem seems to be with KA engines, and the stock Nerva engine

Edited by Matrix Aran
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/7/2017 at 8:10 AM, Matrix Aran said:

I'm having an odd problem I can't seem to solve. For whatever reason, I can't get the Near Future Electrical patch reactors to generate any heat on the engines.

Expand  

I had this problem as well, but I'm not sure it's the problem you're having. You have to first activate the engine via staging; just using the tweakable menu doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/7/2017 at 8:12 PM, Rayder said:

I had this problem as well, but I'm not sure it's the problem you're having. You have to first activate the engine via staging; just using the tweakable menu doesn't work.

Expand  

Would you believe... In all my testing... I never tried that. I figured it was something as simple and silly as that. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/8/2017 at 1:25 AM, Matrix Aran said:

Would you believe... In all my testing... I never tried that. I figured it was something as simple and silly as that. Thank you.

Expand  

If you look back a few pages I actually posted here with the same problem. I thought the mod was broken or something. Eventually I found that out myself haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've run into a weird issue that i didn't see elsewhere reported in the thread--the sheath for the LV-100 Trimodal Nuclear engine is set by default to have your flag appear on either side. 

In my game, the flags show up fine in the VAB, but in the game they're just white rectangles. Other appearances of the flag on the ship are rendered correctly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello.  I searched through several pages trying to find the answer to my question but may have missed it.

Regardless, I want to say that @Nertea I love your engines, the models and textures are 2nd to none.

While I totally respect the change in style of engine to include reactor (I am using most of your NF addons), I would prefer not to  use them with stock or even your engines at this time in my current save.  I have multiple active vessels with your engines and the NERV and would prefer not to break my save with any change.  I am just looking to go from the reactor/heatgen/ecgen to just LF consumption.

Thanks to anyone that helps and sorry if I missed a (probably obvious) answer somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kerbal Atomics 0.3.4

  •  Marked for KSP 1.2.2
  •  Updated bundled MM to 2.7.5
  •  Updated bundled B9PartSwitch to 1.5.3
  •  Updated bundled CRP to 0.6.4
  •  Updated DeployableEngines to 2.1.0
  •  Fixed a typo in an NFE extras patch

Additionally, please note the license change for all mods going forward.

  On 1/21/2017 at 5:47 PM, Cornholio said:

Hello.  I searched through several pages trying to find the answer to my question but may have missed it.

Regardless, I want to say that @Nertea I love your engines, the models and textures are 2nd to none.

While I totally respect the change in style of engine to include reactor (I am using most of your NF addons), I would prefer not to  use them with stock or even your engines at this time in my current save.  I have multiple active vessels with your engines and the NERV and would prefer not to break my save with any change.  I am just looking to go from the reactor/heatgen/ecgen to just LF consumption.

 

Expand  

Install the NTRsUseLF extra. Do not install the NFE integration Extra. See readme for details. 

Edited by Nertea
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sorry if this has been asked already in this thread, but can I trust kerbal engineer on these delta-v calculations? LoxAugmented gives me almost double the delta-v and double the TWR of pure H2. The TWR I expected, but not the delta-v, as it makes pure H2 kind of absolete, no?

Edit: Has been answered.

aMylnlq.png

 

Edited by SilentWindOfDoom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2017 at 10:08 AM, SilentWindOfDoom said:

I am sorry if this has been asked already in this thread, but can I trust kerbal engineer on these delta-v calculations? LoxAugmented gives me almost double the delta-v and double the TWR of pure H2. The TWR I expected, but not the delta-v, as it makes pure H2 kind of absolete, no?

~snip~

 

Expand  

Yea, that's accurate. It has to do with the density of LH2. You have a much higher isp, but because LH2 is so light, you have much less reaction mass. Note that your pure LH2 craft is much lighter than your hydrolox craft. If you make your LH2 tank bigger so that the masses of both craft are equal you'll see that the pure H2 craft has much higher dV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2017 at 12:33 PM, Ralathon said:

Yea, that's accurate. It has to do with the density of LH2. You have a much higher isp, but because LH2 is so light, you have much less reaction mass. Note that your pure LH2 craft is much lighter than your hydrolox craft. If you make your LH2 tank bigger so that the masses of both craft are equal you'll see that the pure H2 craft has much higher dV.

Expand  

I didn't think about that. I mean I did notice the overall mass of the craft was much lower, I just didn't connect the dots.

It is a little bit unfortunate as far as game balance is concerned, seeing as putting mass into orbit is a lot easier than putting those massive (in terms of size) LH2 tanks up. At least for me. I suppose I can always just ignore the Lox mode, or only include a little bit of Oxidizer it for when i need a boost. Thanks for the reply.

Edited by SilentWindOfDoom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/24/2017 at 1:09 PM, SilentWindOfDoom said:

I didn't think about that. 

It is a little bit unfortunate as far as game balance is concerned, seeing as putting mass into orbit is a lot easier than putting those massive (in terms of size) LH2 tanks up. At least for me. I suppose I can always just ignore the Lox mode, or only include a little bit of Oxidizer it for when i need a boost. Thanks for the reply.

Expand  

Try scaling up the solar system so that getting into orbit becomes much harder. Mass will become a much bigger concern than size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  On 2/2/2017 at 1:17 AM, CheckYoStaging said:

I have been having some trouble with boiloff.  I am using Kerbal Atomics, Cryogenic Engines, and Real Fuels.  For some reason, even when I have a ton of electric charge, I lose liquid hydrogen at a very fast rate from the cryogenic tanks.

Expand  

Are you using the latest version?  There was a bug that if you ever ran out of electricity, it would boil off forever, but that was fixed.

If you right-click on the tank, what does it say for status?  Does it say it's boiling off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/2/2017 at 1:17 AM, CheckYoStaging said:

I have been having some trouble with boiloff.  I am using Kerbal Atomics, Cryogenic Engines, and Real Fuels.  For some reason, even when I have a ton of electric charge, I lose liquid hydrogen at a very fast rate from the cryogenic tanks.

Expand  

If you have RF, boiloff is managed by RF, and there's not active cooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with Emancipator engine - it has two gimbal modules and two engine modules - one with LqdHydrogen and one with LqdHydrogen and EnrichedUranium. I have recent Near Future Technologies installed.

Here is a CFG of this engine - can someone help me delete additional gimbal modules and engine modules? Or maybe mod developer can look ino it :) Thanks.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/krhgpybgx76rvzx/ntr-gc-25-2.cfg?dl=0

Edited by GrzesiekB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/11/2017 at 11:11 AM, GrzesiekB said:

Problem with Emancipator engine - it has two gimbal modules and two engine modules - one with LqdHydrogen and one with LqdHydrogen and EnrichedUranium. I have recent Near Future Technologies installed.

Here is a CFG of this engine - can someone help me delete additional gimbal modules and engine modules? Or maybe mod developer can look ino it :) Thanks.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/krhgpybgx76rvzx/ntr-gc-25-2.cfg?dl=0

Expand  

I think one is for the core engine, the other for the 2 gas outlets you use for roll control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/11/2017 at 2:28 PM, GrzesiekB said:

So this is the only engine in the pack which uses enriched uranium?

Expand  

Technically all nuclear reactors, including those in the engines, run on limited enriched uranium. You can get that with the near future electrics patch.

As to why the core engine has limited uranium even at stock, no clue. Maybe it does actually shoot out a bunch of uranium?

Edited by Temeter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...