mpk10 Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Female Kerbals: What if they all weighed slightly less?? Fidelity meets pragmatic delta-v obsessives! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RA3236 Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Wouldn't make any difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreeningGalaxy Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Assuming they have similar densities to male kerbals (just with the visually-apparent lower volume), then no, it wouldn't make any difference. The game already considers parts that would be fairly heavy on that scale to be massless (or if it doesn't anymore, then no one can tell) so there's really no point. Plus, there's also that little detail that, last I heard, kerbals don't actually contribute to the vessel's mass at all while they're inside a capsule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantab Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Why should Kerbals have the same sexual dimorphism as humans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpk10 Posted April 6, 2016 Author Share Posted April 6, 2016 huh. i guess i just assumed a capsule with a kerbal in it was heavier than one without. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sal_vager Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Thank you for the suggestion mpk10, but I think we don't need any massism in KSP. Closing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts