Debunk a conspiracy theory!

[JebKeb]

Pretty much, you provide a link, and write up a respone.

For example:

We didn't land on the moon

1. The cylinder was a fuel tank, not a cabin. The crew stayed in the capasule and the LM
2. In 1959 we had barely gone past LEO. The VA belts aren't as strong as we though. And also, they only passed through them for a short time.
3. There is gravity on the moon!
4. There's a thing called insulation, if I presume you're talking about LOX. Anything else and you're just technobabbling.
5. There is very little to transmit heat in space. Also, insulation and air conditioning. The moon is a vacuum, so liquid water would boil long before it heated up enough. That's why there's no liquid water on the moon!
6. Short rebuttal: zomg. Long one: The resolution in these photos is too small to see anything useful. But you may have given me an idea for a science fiction story. 
7. See any stars during the day? Don't say the atmosphere, you can see them at night. The moon is highly reflective, so it's brighter than the stars.
8. Umm...I don't know where to start.
9. ^
10. ^ intensely
11. There's a thing called recoil. The atmosphere is too fluid to push against. (That's why propellers are wings, not screws.)
12. The fuel was in the rocket stages, not the capsule. And 1910?! I think you're a troll. You're still fun to dissect!
13. Check urself b4 u shrek urself. Also, we kind of launched on Earth, y'know?
14. Got any proof?
15. Physics won't allow this. I've also looked at the moon through a telescope, in no way painful.
16. What does this prove? Did this processing involve drawing?
17. Eerm...
18. Nixon was not president. Get me some proof he was.
19. Rockets are flimsily constructed and hasty. Also, the stuff was ice, covers, bits of launch tower...
20. Check urself b4 u shrek urself. And the department of Top-Secret Coverups. What a revealing name...
21. It's a movie. You've never been in a rocket, so you don't know how accurate it is.
22. It did not explode. An oxygen tank exploded.
23. Just because there are two opposing views, doesn't mean it's fake. It's like saying because people believe in flat and round Earth the Earth doesn't exist.
24. There's no moisture for it to go hard. Also, dust is quite slippery.
25. No 25? You liar.

Please don't get too political or ideological.

[legoclone09]

I think that the post was meant to be sarcastic.

EDIT: Not this one, the conspiracy one.

Edited May 27, 2016 by legoclone09

[cubinator]

17 hours ago, legoclone09 said:

I think that the post was meant to be sarcastic.

EDIT: Not this one, the conspiracy one.

I like to pretend they're all sarcastic.