The Number Game Continued

[Sirius628]

2 (-)

 

[53miner53]

3+

[Sirius628]

2-

[munlander1]

3+

[munlander1]

On March 23, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Sirius628 said:

but the win is not counted due to a medal of dishonour

I would like to contest this. While the medal of dishonor was clearly diserved,

it was not stated in the current or past rules it would null a victory like it has here. I would be completely fine with it being added to the current rule book. But would like this win to be counted. 

Edited May 7, 2017 by munlander1

[53miner53]

14 minutes ago, munlander1 said:

I would like to contest this. While the medal of dishonor was clearly diserved,

it was not stated in the current or past rules it would null a victory like it has here. I would be completely fine with it being added to the current rule book. But would like this win to be counted. 

Not to mention, if I remember correctly, there have been similar chains in at least one of the previous negative victories, and those were not mentioned at the end of those games.

Also, 4+

[munlander1]

5+

[Shadow Wolf56]

6+

[qzgy]

5-

[munlander1]

6+

[Sirius628]

12 hours ago, munlander1 said:

I would like to contest this. While the medal of dishonor was clearly diserved,

it was not stated in the current or past rules it would null a victory like it has here. I would be completely fine with it being added to the current rule book. But would like this win to be counted. 

1) I did record your win, I just didn't count it towards the overall score.

2) I actually had this rule AFK, I just didn't put it in the actual rules yet.

11 hours ago, 53miner53 said:

Not to mention, if I remember correctly, there have been similar chains in at least one of the previous negative victories, and those were not mentioned at the end of those games.

Also, 4+

Also, by previous negative victories, do you mean the two in this thread, or the old thread?

5 (-)

Edited May 7, 2017 by Sirius628

[munlander1]

3 minutes ago, Sirius628 said:

I did record your win, I just didn't count it towards the overall score.

I would like it to be scored though:

3 minutes ago, Sirius628 said:

2) I actually had this rule AFK, I just didn't put it in the actual rules yet

How would I have known It was a rule then?

11 hours ago, 53miner53 said:

Not to mention, if I remember correctly, there have been similar chains in at least one of the previous negative victories, and those were not mentioned at the end of those games

Will  you be negating the appropriate wins?

[53miner53]

5 minutes ago, Sirius628 said:

1) I did record your win, I just didn't count it towards the overall score.

2) I actually had this rule AFK, I just didn't put it in the actual rules yet.

Also, by previous negative victories, do you mean the two in this thread, or the old thread?

5 (-)

I was talking in this thread. 

6+

[munlander1]

1 minute ago, 53miner53 said:

I was talking in this thread. 

6+

I know, was quoting you for the great point you made.

7+

[Sirius628]

3 minutes ago, munlander1 said:

I would like it to be scored though:

How would I have known It was a rule then?

Will  you be negating the appropriate wins?

1) Beggars can't be choosers. 

2) Well, it already said that ot will be recorded snidely, I just wanted it to be more specific.

3) The first win with over 1000 posts, or the second one?

5 (-)

Edited May 7, 2017 by Sirius628

[munlander1]

2 minutes ago, Sirius628 said:

Well, it already said that ot will be recorded snidely, I just wanted it to be more specific.

Positives are still at zero. Will you be negating the negative wins?

6+

[Sirius628]

5 (-)

[munlander1]

3 minutes ago, munlander1 said:

Positives are still at zero. Will you be negating the negative wins?

@Sirius628

6+

[Sirius628]

Just now, munlander1 said:

@Sirius628

6+

I'm trying to look through the darned wins!

5-

[munlander1]

Just now, Sirius628 said:

I'm trying to look through the darned wins!

5-

Ok thanks! 

6+

[53miner53]

5 minutes ago, Sirius628 said:

I'm trying to look through the darned wins!

5-

Thanks!

7+

[Sirius628]

5-

I looked through them, and while there was an alternation of negative votes, I stoppped it before it reached -100.

There was also a part where it seemed like we stayed between -1 and 1 for more than 10 posts, but a skirmish broke up that line.

[Sirius628]

Fine, I added a "Cheater wins" category. Happy now?

[munlander1]

14 minutes ago, Sirius628 said:

Fine, I added a "Cheater wins" category. Happy now?

Yes! Thank you 

[munlander1]

I suggest a slight change to the rules though. The medal of dishonor invalidation should only apply at |90|- |100|.