Jump to content

Sierra Nevada Thread (Dream Chaser, plus!)


tater

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...

The 'trunk' also being a berthing mechanism/docking port may also be a bit of future-proofing. Say Orbital Reef becomes a thing and they decide an expanded ring is more optimal. Redesign the trunk, a solid rocket booster extra and away you go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, AckSed said:

The 'trunk' also being a berthing mechanism/docking port may also be a bit of future-proofing. Say Orbital Reef becomes a thing and they decide an expanded ring is more optimal. Redesign the trunk, a solid rocket booster extra and away you go.

Great thinking outside the box there.  It is a shame to put mass in orbit only to deorbit it to destruction shortly after.

 What if the DC and Dragon trunks had enough extra RCS and some code to slowly rendezvous and dock (or somehow more simply aggregate) together in orbit over time awaiting usefulness?  There would be no rush so it could be very efficient and they could simply rz with the nearest viable cluster of spare parts

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont know if using orbit as ammo dump is a good idea, orbit such an asset over a hostile country and they are probibly justified firing their asat weapons at it. you are better off with point to point rockets that are more unpredictable and harder to intercept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nuke said:

i dont know if using orbit as ammo dump is a good idea, orbit such an asset over a hostile country and they are probibly justified firing their asat weapons at it. you are better off with point to point rockets that are more unpredictable and harder to intercept.

Good point.  Ammo isn’t the only thing people need though. MREs, medical supplies, spares etc also.

Point to point does seem more logical.  One wouldn’t have to wait for the depot orbit to cross close to the LZ for one thing.

Disaster relief might be a better use case than war.  But I suppose “war” is a subset of “disaster”, so…

Edited by darthgently
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

More details of Sierra's activities, including an in-house mission control: https://spacenews.com/sierra-space-expands-spaceplane-fleet-with-in-house-mission-control/

Here's the sweet part for a tech-head like me, though:

Spoiler

image-1.jpeg?ssl=1

That is the demonstrator version of their smallest habitat, with, if you zoom in, models of the possible 4-module station, stowed configuration inside the fairing, inflated configuration and the development paths and stowed configuration of the larger LIFE modules.

If I don't miss my guess, the display we can partially see on the lower left has it standing on the Moon. A hab is a hab, it seems.

Very exciting. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
2 hours ago, AckSed said:

Sierra Space makes non-sexy but useful prototype equipment for the ISS: https://www.universetoday.com/169229/a-trash-compactor-is-going-to-the-space-station/

Would be interesting if the trash is compacted into a small subchamber that can be periodically exposed to vacuum to kill anything growing in it.  Though the heating during compaction probably does a good job of that.

 And yes, I’m aware that there are some very tiny things that survive vacuum reliably well

Edited by darthgently
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...