Jump to content

Voyager team plays games with the power supply to keep probe alive


Recommended Posts

https://www.npr.org/2023/04/30/1172921603/nasa-voyager-2-2026-backup-power-space

Quote

With Voyager 2's power supply dwindling, NASA was about to shut down one of its five science instruments onboard the spacecraft. To keep it going, engineers had already sacrificed heaters and other nonessential parts that drained power. But engineers have now found a way to tap reserve power from a safety mechanism that regulates the spacecraft's voltage. "The move will enable the mission to postpone shutting down a science instrument until 2026, rather than this year," NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory said this past week.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the thing is, they over-build these probes as much as they can because just launching the mission at all is so expensive. So once they complete their primary mission, they can start using up their margins and redundancies to keep going.

This mission had something like 11 or 12 science instruments, and only 5 of them are still alive (but now that they are far from any planets, not all of the instruments would be useful anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mikegarrison said:

Well, the thing is, they over-build these probes as much as they can because just launching the mission at all is so expensive. So once they complete their primary mission, they can start using up their margins and redundancies to keep going.

This mission had something like 11 or 12 science instruments, and only 5 of them are still alive (but now that they are far from any planets, not all of the instruments would be useful anyway).

Exactly what I meant, but since the article spelled the points you highlight I was going for concise 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/5/2023 at 6:33 PM, mikegarrison said:

Well, the thing is, they over-build these probes as much as they can because just launching the mission at all is so expensive. So once they complete their primary mission, they can start using up their margins and redundancies to keep going.

This mission had something like 11 or 12 science instruments, and only 5 of them are still alive (but now that they are far from any planets, not all of the instruments would be useful anyway).

They also knew they only had one shot for the "full tour" for at least a hundred years.  So there was even more desire to overbuild.  But if they wanted to extend the mission, they could have used americanium instead of plutonium in the RTGs.  But that would have reduced margins and/or added mass during the critical moments when near planets.  So plutonium was ideal and they went with that (and they were also familiar with plutonium RTGs).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...