Slew Posted November 20, 2011 Author Share Posted November 20, 2011 Preview of some upcoming parts: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greencross Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Proton and Soyuz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trvtannenberg Posted November 25, 2011 Share Posted November 25, 2011 When we can except new version? I can\'t wait for proton engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
venku122 Posted November 25, 2011 Share Posted November 25, 2011 Preview of some upcoming parts:It looks so round. Weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slew Posted November 26, 2011 Author Share Posted November 26, 2011 When we can except new version? I can\'t wait for proton engine.I\'d like to release the new version on Sunday (27th).It looks so round. WeirdWhat do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC3craze Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 I\'d like to release the new version on Sunday (27th).What do you mean?*Eagerly anticipates Australia time to come around* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmiteZero Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Hey! While I\'m here...The 1m->2m fairing cone adapter.. I\'ve noticed that one part alone causes a massive FPS drop for me on any medium complexity rocket usually just until it\'s jettisoned. On a slightly more complicated rocket (That runs fine without the part), the inclusion of that one part will kill my framerate any time it\'s close enough to have it\'s physics calculated. Warping >x2 and taking things out of physics brings my framerate back to normal while I warp. I think something might be wrong with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slew Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 Well I\'m almost ready to release the new parts, but I\'ve run into a little snag:http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=4531.0If it turns out that multiple gimbals aren\'t possible, I\'ll release without animated nozzles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberion Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Or you could always just make a 9x adapter and release each as a tiny engine to place manually. Somewhat tedius, but having a tiny, kitten sized engine might be cool, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luigibro606 Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Or you could always just make a 9x adapter and release each as a tiny engine to place manually. Somewhat tedius, but having a tiny, kitten sized engine might be cool, too. Meow. Kitten power to the Mun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slew Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 Well I may have missed Sunday, but the new version is now out.Two heavy lift engines (1m and 2m) and two side-mounted liquid boosters. Enjoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC3craze Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Weren\'t we just on v1.2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slew Posted November 29, 2011 Author Share Posted November 29, 2011 Weren\'t we just on v1.2?Nope, last version was 0.1.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC3craze Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 You know, a more powerful 1m engine would be useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slew Posted December 4, 2011 Author Share Posted December 4, 2011 You know, a more powerful 1m engine would be useful.More powerful than the RD-88? That thing is almost as powerful as a 2m engine!What on Kerbin are you trying to lift? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kairu Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 It would be nice to cut RD-77 and P-500 in two parts - actually the engine and side-mounted fuel tank - and to increase RD-77 characteristics to match with RD-88 performance. For greater convenience and greater flexibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mini Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 Can this MOD be used in conjunction with any other mods? I have 3 copies of KSP installed 1 stock, 1 Novasilisko and 1 Novapunch, can i run this mod with any of my modded copies or does it need a clean slate copy to work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flixxbeatz Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 Can this MOD be used in conjunction with any other mods? I have 3 copies of KSP installed 1 stock, 1 Novasilisko and 1 Novapunch, can i run this mod with any of my modded copies or does it need a clean slate copy to work?I thought I\'m just the only one who has multiple copies of KSP. lol Got 2 copies anyway: Vanilla (with SIDR, KW, SP, and tons of other mods) and Silisko Edition (with KW Challenger and NovaPunch) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC3craze Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 More powerful than the RD-88? That thing is almost as powerful as a 2m engine!What on Kerbin are you trying to lift? I need a center stack engine. Not a radial liquid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flixxbeatz Posted December 4, 2011 Share Posted December 4, 2011 More powerful than the RD-88? That thing is almost as powerful as a 2m engine!What on Kerbin are you trying to lift? 8)Image courtesy of NovaSilisko. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slew Posted December 5, 2011 Author Share Posted December 5, 2011 It would be nice to cut RD-77 and P-500 in two parts - actually the engine and side-mounted fuel tank - and to increase RD-77 characteristics to match with RD-88 performance. For greater convenience and greater flexibility.I considered that. Honestly, I went with one-part engines because they\'re simpler. I may revisit this decision in the future.Can this MOD be used in conjunction with any other mods? I have 3 copies of KSP installed 1 stock, 1 Novasilisko and 1 Novapunch, can i run this mod with any of my modded copies or does it need a clean slate copy to work?Down Under is compatible with all other mods. There shouldn\'t be any naming conflicts.Balance-wise, it\'s designed to coexist with the default parts (not Silisko Edition).I need a center stack engine. Not a radial liquid.The RD-88 is a stacking engine with a thrust of 225. It\'s the orange one.The RD-77 is the tall side engine with just 75 thrust.8)Image courtesy of NovaSilisko.Touché.---In other news, the next update is coming along nicely.I\'ve added some easy-to-use nosecone fairings (2m diameter), a brand new ASAS instrument ring, an RCS fuel tank, an even narrower decoupler and a tiny engine for orbital manuevers.Next up: landing legs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flixxbeatz Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Here. I\'ve just Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slew Posted December 5, 2011 Author Share Posted December 5, 2011 Here. I\'ve just Nice one.The bonus clip is great. I\'ve had a close call like that myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC3craze Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 The RD-88 is a stacking engine with a thrust of 225. It\'s the orange one.The RD-77 is the tall side engine with just 75 thrust.Oh, right. Forgot about the Soyuz orange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slew Posted December 11, 2011 Author Share Posted December 11, 2011 New version is now out!I am exhausted. ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts