Jump to content

I am full of grief and coffee


Whackjob

Recommended Posts

Youve probably answered this before, but what is your PC? Im guessing you got at least 2 cores of cpu that are overclocked like crazy. My i7 literally groans at 1k parts. i cant imagine a 3.5k part ship.

It's not even an i3. It's one of those old 2.53Ghz "Core 2 quad duo extreme" things that predate those.

#EDIT: Good grief. Forgot to put the youtube vid in my coffee thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good god, I'm slipping. Here's the video of me landing the tower on the Mun.

I like how it shows how effective the handmade landing gear is. And how you only realize how big it is when Jeb steps out.

Now I go coma until tomorrowsday get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladies and gents,

... we have Dunafall. Enjoy.

The trial run is more than halfway over, now. All that is left is to refuel, launch, land on Ike, refuel again, and head home to Kerbin. Next vid will be landing that tower at KSP. If I can manage it, I want to set her down right on top of the VAB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know whackjob every time I watch one of your videos and I see your monstrosities in flight and hear you laugh... I get the most wonderful picture in my imagination of an evil genius.

That said you mentioned in one of your videos that one of your towers you could have lifted but it would have taken hours to make orbit... That has me wondering, just how long was your longest launch? I've seen you lift some pretty big ships so I can imagine a while, specially considering that I have seen over half an hour personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That has me wondering, just how long was your longest launch?

Longest launch I ever did was two hours fifteen minutes (I think?) realtime. I was pushing 6,000 parts on that build. It still failed to achieve orbit... was one of my very early creations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that PhysX, KSP's physics engine, isnt capable of multi-threading. I7's are octo-core proceesors, but because of this problem, KSP can only use a single one of these for physics calculations, which are the most difficult ones to be done in flight. The preformance is mostly based on how fast your single processor is clocked, and adding more wont help.

Edit: Wait... im sure this was in reply to something else, which seems to be gone. It doesn't make much sense now.

Edited by Spyritdragon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More grief. More coffee.

I decided to start a new career mode.

... and accidentally overwrote my sandbox save. The lander tower is gone. [EXPLETIVE PREEMPTIVELY DELETED]

Ah well. No time to be bummed. What's done is done and there's no un-done-ing it. Brush beard, truck on.

I need a new project.

Edited by Whackjob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More grief. More coffee.

I decided to start a new career mode.

... and accidentally overwrote my sandbox save. The lander tower is gone. [EXPLETIVE PREEMPTIVELY DELETED]

Ah well. No time to be bummed. What's done is done and there's no un-done-ing it. Brush beard, truck on.

I need a new project.

You could have a go at doing something awesome with planes for a change from rockets :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...