roosterr Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 (edited) Read captions for some details.Javascript is disabled. View full albumAlso, I added some of my own requirements that were not listed:Accurate motor configuration, 5 on the first stage (F-1), 5 on the second stage (J-2), and the third stage also a J2, etc. etc.Center core engines on stage one and two gimblas lockedCore motors on stage one and two cut off firstInitial launch sequence accurate in order of engine ignitions and clamps(see images)No aparagus stage separationCrew escape accurate motor configurationThe use of ullage and separation motorsRCS Thrusters placed close to real life.I used this as my building guide: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Saturn_v_schematic.jpgAnd this for my staging: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V#StagesPoints for accurate anatomy? Edited October 8, 2013 by roosterr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonSpace_CEO Posted October 7, 2013 Share Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) Imgur:[iframe class=imgur-album" width="100%" height="550" frameborder="0" src="http://imgur.com/a/wwTQj/embed][/iframe]So, the full 218?No crazy rover though. Sorry Gusturbo, but the rocket was way too unstable. Edited October 16, 2013 by JonSpace_CEO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeldrak Posted October 8, 2013 Author Share Posted October 8, 2013 Ah, nice to see, that there are still people doing this challenge Still, you should try:[*Imgur]wwTQj[/imgur]Without the * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrokenPhysics Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 While waiting for 0.22 to be released, I decided to do my first challenge.Played out pretty nice Javascript is disabled. View full album- Basics +30- 3-man Mission +10- 2-man Lander +10- 2-stage Lander (leave the decent-engine on the mün) +20- Escape tower? +10- Lander stored behind the CM during ascent +20- Lander tucked away behind some fairing? +5- Free return trajectory to the mün +10- Flawless landing (no parts broke off, Neil Armstrong is watching you!) +10- Got a Munar Roving Vehicle (MRV) on board? +15 (although it didn't get very far...)- After succesfull Mün landing docked CM and MM in Orbit (no swapping ships without docking them first) +10- MM disposed by crashing it into the Mün (remove Kerbal first!) +5- Plant flag on the Mün (no cumulative, i.e. two flags don't get you 6 points) +3- Spashing down on Kerbin (land on water) +5- Deploy münar sub-satellite before returning to Kerbin +10 Points- Land within 100 meters of the NAM +15- I was roving on the Moon one day... (no points for me here, since I crashed the Rover after a few meters...)- MSEP: That'll do - Deploy two experimental packages at the landing site +5 pointsTotal: 193 points (if I calculated everything right ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeldrak Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share Posted October 16, 2013 You've been added Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisd Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 If you're still looking for extra points to add to this, maybe points for the MSEPs being deployed by the rover, rather than dropped from orbit? As far as I understand, the MSEPs were something the astronauts deployed by hand, so dropping them from the rover, or from the lander after it's landed (or maybe while it's below a certain surface velocity?) would be closer to an Apollo mission.I'm working on my attempt for this right now. There are a few "stretch goals" I'm aiming for, some of which people on this thread have already done, but I'm not sure if anyone's done all of them:Munar Subsatellite:- RCS only, no liquid fueled engine. (As I understand, it was more or less just pushed out of the SIM bay.)- Antenna, instruments, and power. (Able to perform SCIENCE in 0.22.)MSEP:- RTG powered only. (batteries allowed, but no solar)- Antenna, instruments, and power. (Able to perform SCIENCE in 0.22.)- No engine/RCS/SAS of any sort, must be positioned purely by the rover or lander.Rover:- 2 seats.- Battery power only.Launch craft:- 3 stages to orbit, and trans-munar injection.- perform LM/COM swap on the way to the mun.- leave the fairing that hides the lander attached to the 3rd stage after the lander is removed.Lander:- Battery power only. (or a fuel cell, if I can figure out how to create one using opposed liquid fuel engines so they don't generate any net thrust.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisd Posted October 26, 2013 Share Posted October 26, 2013 I haven't had a chance to take screenshots from the video I recorded, but here's my entry: Should be 218 points. Goals- 3-man Mission +10- 2-man Lander +10- 2-stage Lander (leave the decent-engine on the mün) +20- Main rocked aspargus'd? -10 (Wernher von Kerman does not like aspargus!)- Escape tower? +10- Lander stored behind the CM during ascent +20- Lander tucked away behind some fairing? +5- Free return trajectory to the mün +10- Flawless landing (no parts broke off, Neil Armstrong is watching you!) +10- Got a Munar Roving Vehicle (MRV) on board? +15- After succesfull Mün landing docked CM and MM in Orbit (no swapping ships without docking them first) +10- MM disposed by crashing it into the Mün (remove Kerbal first!) +5- Plant flag on the Mün (no cumulative, i.e. two flags don't get you 6 points) +3- Spashing down on Kerbin (land on water) +5- Kerbal dies -20Awesome new goals:- Deploy münar sub-satellite before returning to Kerbin +10 PointsLanding accuracy (not cumulative)- Land within 100 meters of the NAM +15I was roving on the Moon one day... (not cumulative)- Are we there yet? - 15 points - Drive beyond 10km of the landerMSEP - Mün Surface Experimental Package (not cumulative)MSEP must have power, probecore and at least one science-thingy- Science extravaganza! - 15 points - Deploy four experimental packages 2.5km from the landing site (and at least 2.5km from eachother) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Engineering Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 I haven't had a chance to take screenshots from the video I recorded, but here's my entry: Great video! Fantastic editing and music choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisd Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Great video! Fantastic editing and music choices.Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it. It's the first KSP video I've ever done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
programagor Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 (edited) Here is my attempt:Javascript is disabled. View full albumSuccesful mission +30Goals- 3-man Mission +10- 2-man Lander +10- 2-stage Lander (leave the decent-engine on the mün) +20- Main rocked not aspargus'd -0- Escape tower +10- Lander stored behind the CM during ascent +20- Lander tucked away behind some fairing? +5- Free return trajectory to the Mün +10- Flawless landing +10- Got a Munar Roving Vehicle (MRV) on board? +15- After succesfull Mün landing docked CM and MM in Orbit +10- Plant flag on the Mün +3- Spashing down on Kerbin (land on water) +5Total: 158 pointsNote: Some screenshots are taken during second, almost exactly the same mission due to lighting. Edited December 5, 2013 by programagor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeldrak Posted December 9, 2013 Author Share Posted December 9, 2013 haha, thats incredible, that people are still doing it apollo style Sorry for the delay - you two have been added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisd Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Thanks for putting together such an awesome challenge. I had so much fun doing it. I did a lot of looking at photos and diagrams of a Saturn V, the LM, CM, etc, trying to make it as realistic as possible. The hardest part was sticking with the engine layout: 5 Mainsails (F-1) on the bottom, 5 Skippers (J-2) on the 2nd stage, and 1 Skipper (J-2) on the 3rd stage. Really limits how much the rest of it can weigh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Engineering Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Shameless plug for the "Duna Apollo Style" challenge, which is based on this challenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Engineering Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Thanks for putting together such an awesome challenge. I had so much fun doing it. I did a lot of looking at photos and diagrams of a Saturn V, the LM, CM, etc, trying to make it as realistic as possible. The hardest part was sticking with the engine layout: 5 Mainsails (F-1) on the bottom, 5 Skippers (J-2) on the 2nd stage, and 1 Skipper (J-2) on the 3rd stage. Really limits how much the rest of it can weigh!Very good attention to detail, especially with the 5x Mainsails -> 5x Skipper -> 1x Skipper configuration! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John FX Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 I don`t know whether to thank you or curse you.I think I`ll thank you for this thread which has basically been all I have been doing with KSP since. This thread saw my first Apollo style landing and I never stopped. The latest thing I have been doing is writing an autopilot for KerPollo in KOS. I can launch, get to a 10-12km orbit around Mun and then burn for Kerbin and land safely. Currently the actual landing is manual but I am working on that.This is the current lander I am using. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisd Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Wow! That's an impressive looking Eagle. Where did you store the rover during descent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeldrak Posted December 10, 2013 Author Share Posted December 10, 2013 That lander looks awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John FX Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Wow! That's an impressive looking Eagle. Where did you store the rover during descent?Hehe, inside the fairing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisd Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Hehe, inside the fairing...Above the engine? Intriguing. Don't those fairing panels collide with the lander when you try to get it out? I tried doing something like that (launching my munar subs satellites though a panel) but it didn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John FX Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Above the engine? Intriguing. Don't those fairing panels collide with the lander when you try to get it out? I tried doing something like that (launching my munar subs satellites though a panel) but it didn't work.It`s sort of hung to the side of the engine with the fuel on the other side. It drops off the bottom onto its side then uses the righting mechanism to wriggle out from under the lander. It`s why the lander has to have so much ground clearance otherwise I would use different legs.The latest version is a bit closer packed and has ALSEP which fills some gaps as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisd Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 Wow, that is certainly an unconventional design! How does it fly? Did you get the center of mass lined up with the thrust nicely? I'm looking forward to seeing screenshots/video of your mission Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John FX Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 (edited) Wow, that is certainly an unconventional design! How does it fly? Did you get the center of mass lined up with the thrust nicely? I'm looking forward to seeing screenshots/video of your mission I used the `least damage` approach and put the rover in the only place it could go and put the fuel as close to the CoM as I could. It flies better the less fuel it has. Have a look at the link in my Sig if you want to see more images. Edited January 20, 2014 by John FX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhomphaia Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Updating some of my designs and thought an Apollo style mission might be in order.Javascript is disabled. View full albumBase +30Goals - 3-man Mission +10 - 2-man Lander +10 - 2-stage Lander (leave the decent-engine on the mün) +20 - Escape tower? +10 - Lander stored behind the CM during ascent +20 - Lander tucked away behind some fairing? +5 - Free return trajectory to the mün +10 - Flawless landing +10 - Got a Munar Roving Vehicle (MRV) on board? +15 - After succesfull Mün landing docked CM and MM in Orbit +10 - MM disposed by crashing it into the Mün +5 - Plant flag on the Mün +3 - Spashing down on Kerbin +5- Deploy münar sub-satellite before returning to Kerbin +10 Points- Land within 100 meters of the NAM +15- Are we there yet? +15 points - For science! +10 pointsTotal 213 points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziv Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Nowadays I love to experiment with very small ships so I made a tiny sized Mun Lander and Command Module: http://imgur.com/a/54KRy(I also made a general mission but with MechJeb so I don't count that one as an entry here, but here are the pictures of that: http://imgur.com/a/uVzVq#0)my points:30 - basic points20 - two-stage lander20 - Lander stored behind the CM during ascent10 - Free return trajectory to the mün10 - Flawless landing10 - CM+MM docking3 - Flag planted5 - Splashing down-------------------108 (+1000 points in the minimal category ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panzerknoef Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Could I still give it a try? Or would that be considered necro-posting? (Last post was less than a month ago though) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts