Jump to content

Lack of thrust when stack separates


Recommended Posts

This worked with the last version, but for some reason, its not working now.

I built my lander, put a rocket on it to get me from Kerbin orbit to Mun orbit.

screenshot0.png

I then attached my standard lifter with stack separator, and the nifty "make it look nice" shroud covers my lander engine....

screenshot1.png

I'm now in Kerbin orbit, and about to separate the last lifter tank and engine from my lander unit.....

screenshot2.png

What happens next is driving me crazy. The shroud doesn't disappear, and when I fire up the engine to get moving, I get absolutely nothing for acceleration. I've tried every engine I can, and still

no acceleration.

screenshot3.png

Have I suffered a total brain fart, and have I put the stack separator on incorrectly? Did I miss something with the new update that changed how things uncouple?

If I drop the engine from the lander, the 8 small engines on the actual lander fire just fine, and have plenty of thrust.

What am I doing wrong!?!

Edited by EmanonP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check your flight log and see if there's anything that broke along the way up. Also try jettisoning the side fairings individually by right clicking the engine and selecting the jettison option. Also try a different engine and see if that changes anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You put the decoupler on upside down! When rocket exhaust is blocked by a part, it produces no thrust.

The red arrows on the side of them point towards the place they detach from, for most purposes this means they should point toward the command pod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I wondered if that was the case, but I thought the arrows pointed towards the direction the force of the "bang" would occur when I triggered it. I thought I was in fact "blowing" the lower unit away from my lander, thereby

avoiding damaging the engine above the separator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supernovy and dlmarti are right; that decoupler is most certainly on upside down. Easiest way to tell aside from the arrows? The fact that it's not attached to that last booster stage when you do decouple it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. They don't damage things above them, just separate off and blast 'down', by default, as seen in the VAB.

Don't feel so bad; I have a rover on Duna suffering from a similar design flaw, and lugging around extra weight because of it. And with a girder on the bottom because I forgot to add a decoupler to it AT ALL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...