Jump to content

Realistic NERVA engines?


Gilliam

Recommended Posts

The only (physical) problem with that one is the "internally cooled transparent wall" section. Materials science needs to catch up with the requirements for that part.

The power density across that wall is enough to melt any transparent material that I know of, even fused quartz. And that's WITH active cooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not especially - the reason nuclear tests stopped was more than "people are scared of the N-word", and a running NTR is looking at levels of radiation comparable to the grounds around Chernobyl mid-meltdown. It's not exactly insignificant.

That's why you use the NTR only in space, as an upper stage.

As architeuthis pointed out, there's almost certainly more radioactivity in an RTG than in an un-activated NTR reactor (the reactor is bigger, but the half-life is 10 million times longer so vastly less radioactive).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...