Jump to content

SLS 1st stage Vs. Saturn V 1st stage.


Recommended Posts

Now, I have been deciding whether an upgraded Saturn V 1st stage would be better than an SLS 1st stage. The info for the stages so you don’t have to look it up :wink:

SLS:

Gross Mass- 979.452 Kg

Dry Mass- 85.270 Kg

Thrust(SL)- 7,440 kN

ISP Sea Lvl.- 363 seconds

(Data is for the Block 1 SLS)

Saturn V:

Gross Mass- 2,300,000 Kg

Dry Mass- 131,000

Thrust(SL)- 33,851 kN

ISP Sea Lvl.- 263 seconds

I have no idea how to calculate delta-v. If someone will be ever so kind to calculate the delta-v of the two stages and post it please do. Thanks. Together we can make a better rocket than the SLS!:cool: (If I don't have all the correct info for calculating tell me)

Edited by Titan Space Agency
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delta-V of a rocket stage without payload or upper-stage mass being considered is completely meaningless.
It is not meaningless because the info can tell you what you need to know to compare first stages, such as what i am doing. You can also use that info to tell you how much mass you can put on that stage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you can't. Delta-v is purely how fast a specific rocket stage would be going if it was launched, completely empty, in the absence of gravity. Saturn V's own third stage would have a much greater delta-v value than the first stage-if you were right, that'd mean the rocket would have done better assembled the other way up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calculationg the delta-v is really simple:

∆V=ln(M0/M1)*Isp*9,81

where M0 is the mass before the burn and M1 the mass after the burn(or M0 the mass with the fuel and M0 the mass without the fuel).

ln is the natural logarithm.

Thank you for your help. At least someone is willing to help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you consider pointing out that you're completely ignoring the SRBs on SLS 'helpful'? Without them the first stage has a loaded thrust-to-weight ratio of less than one-i.e. it wouldn't even be able to leave the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calculationg the delta-v is really simple:

∆V=ln(M0/M1)*Isp*9,81

where M0 is the mass before the burn and M1 the mass after the burn(or M0 the mass with the fuel and M0 the mass without the fuel).

ln is the natural logarithm.

Thank you Mr./Mrs. Goldenpeach. I have used that info (and a scientific calculator) to find the results.

SLS first stage has a delta-v count of 8,693.081 m/s wile the Saturn V has a delta-v count of 7,392.991 m/s. Now the Saturn V might be able to be upgraded to have much more delta-v and match the delta-v of the SLS with boosters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the point of calculating deltaV... By this logic the SLS would be a two stage to orbit if you cadd a stage above it with 1500 deltaV or so. I'm not sure if it is actually 2 stage to orbit. As stated above without boosters the first stage has a TWR <1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the point of calculating deltaV... By this logic the SLS would be a two stage to orbit if you cadd a stage above it with 1500 deltaV or so. I'm not sure if it is actually 2 stage to orbit. As stated above without boosters the first stage has a TWR <1.

Yeah so sls were to be launched without payload? Then we'd have an empty rocket sitting in orbit which is somewhat useless :D.

If you're calculating first stage dV shouldn't you include the mass of the upper stages also?

Like with saturn first stage mFull=3000 tons and mEmpty 849 tons giving with average 280 isp around 3.5k dV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what, I DON'T CARE ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ILL CALCULATE WHAT I PLEASE. I DON'T CARE IF IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also did you know the Sputnick rocket was a single stage with boosters.

At least someone co-oporated. Thank you Goldenpeach for being so kind, unlike the other bozos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't find any info about SLS size but it seems to be that it is as big as Saturn 5. If so, I don't understand why it uses two side boosters to put 130 tons to orbit while Saturn 5 could put 140 tons without any external boosters at all. The only idea that comes to mind is modularity.

And it looks like there is free space left on the 1st stage, is it possible to use SLS with 4 SRBs?:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't find any info about SLS size but it seems to be that it is as big as Saturn 5. If so, I don't understand why it uses two side boosters to put 130 tons to orbit while Saturn 5 could put 140 tons without any external boosters at all. The only idea that comes to mind is modularity.

And it looks like there is free space left on the 1st stage, is it possible to use SLS with 4 SRBs?:cool:

Because the SLS core uses smaller engines than the Saturn V. The payload of the Saturn V was 120 tons to LEO, but it was far from an optimal design. It was built to be quick and dirty, with whatever parts they had available at the time. The SLS has to built with whatever parts are available now.

What would be the point of making variant with 4 SRBs ? There are still no 100 ton payloads to put on the rocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...