Jump to content

Craters on the Mun


Boris_T_Roach

Recommended Posts

Are so damned annoying.... take my latest creation the aptly named Giant mun rover, the result of a drinking competition and 4 days without sleep, sadly due to a design cockup, a suicide burn and screaming "land you &*%&£^£*!!" it ended up in a mun crater on the dark side (which explains how it ended up in a crater)

So park it up at the bottom, deploy solar panels and have a snooze until the sun comes up.

Then we'll just drive.. out...... of....... here..... oh these walls are steep.

Quick look round for the lowest section of crater wall.. hmmm

Cue a 30 minute struggle to get the thing up a 45 degree wall and yes I did cheer when it finally got out....

come on squad... make the walls a bit lower for poor simple rover drivers like me

Boris

16503995DC4AF6E2F85BBE1297EE4A672B5CCDB3

Inspired by Whackjob, built by a genius, flown by a moron :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to go waaay back into my Imgur account, just to see what the biggest rover I ever had on the Mun was. Came up with this:

ymn0LJQ.jpg

So, congratulations! You've beaten the Whack!

So now I'll probably have to go home from the office today, and build something entirely too silly. Something Montypythonesque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow I've beaten Whackjob at building something stupidly large and whats more landing it on the Mun

Actually it was orginally designed to land on Duna with the help of 3 drouge chutes and about 8 main chutes, and was tested around KSC to make sure it could land from a 9km height.

Then it was a case of what the heck, lets land it on the Mun... so replace the drouge assemblies with retro rockets (3 Ft400 tanks/8 mini engines) and change the docking ring underneath for a couple of fuel tanks

to boost it to the mun and slow it enough as it came in... took 3 tries until managing a suicide burn from 35K up... hence it ended up in that crater

Anyways..... if you want to give it a spin, I'll put the craft file up for you and see what you can do (its 390 or so parts on take off)

Boris

...feeling fairly pleased :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh. Let's see how long your record lasts. I got ideas. ;)

EDIT: Back in the old days, I had this monstrosity:

RnHQaIz.jpg

This was well before I learned how to handle actual large construction. At that time I was a mere dabbler. So it's no surprise to see me trying to lift it like this:

20mzdhq.jpg

Obviously I knew little of what I was doing. Flailing about, so to speak. So of course the end result was Fun:

dysSdzR.png

Which is why I don't claim that as my largest rover, given its spectacular failure.

.... but now? Now I've done some actual big builds, and have actual processes of launching big builds. Tonight or tomorrow I will put together a true Whackjovian Munar Rover.

Edited by Whackjob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

-snip-

.... but now? Now I've done some actual big builds, and have actual processes of launching big builds. Tonight or tomorrow I will put together a true Whackjovian Munar Rover.

Uh oh. Looks like we have awakened the Whack. Nobody should ever challenge him. And we should never have.

May god have mercy on our souls (and Kerbals).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I digress, I have had one lander so far that has had to change it's landing site, for it was going to land at a 20-30 degree angle, which wasn't going to be stable at all.

To get back on topic while we await Whackjob's judgment, you have 3 choices for landing on Mun: Flattish ground inside craters, flattish ground between craters, and steeply sloped ground separating these 2. The slopes are usually a bad idea, but the other 2 present problems of their own. This is because rovers seem much better at going up hills than coming down them. So you can get a rover out of a crater but you probably won't get it into a crater in 1 piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys know you can drive up a crater wall at angle right? If a 45 degree climb is too steep then drive at an angle and frive around the sides like a screw top bottle. That will get you to the top of all but the most serious craters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I'm not going to be done that quick. This isn't something I'm going to slap together. I'm planning this one.

I've already got an overall premise laid out. You guys are going to like this one. It'll even be the premiere of a new innovation I've cooked up.

#EDIT: Had to update Kethane just for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whackjob you scare me more right now because you are planning on taking us over with your creation, we are not ready to bow down that hard XD

Oh, come now. It'll be an interesting design that'll give some folks a sense of momentary amusement. That's all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear god what have I started ?

Well.... since the idea is to not only build something huge enough to beat the Whack, but land it on the mun too, I guess its mun rover redesign time

But for now I'll let you all play with my creation

https://www.dropbox.com/s/lmm9tefy44zvfyx/Giant%20rover.zip

It stock apart from a mechjeb pod(used for flight info)

You'll need to orbit it fairly high.. 500km , then refuel it through the handy docking port before sending it to the mun.

I'd advise a suicide burn from about 35km up. dont even try to orbit the mun.. takes too much fuel.

After touchdown, power up the final decent rockets and decouple them to get rid of them... unfurl the solar panels and you're good to go.

Happy rovering

Boris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has turned into a rather interesting challenge. No pictures yet... going to post when done. It will be a few days.

Right now my entire focus is on the main chassis. It goes without saying that it is large. Not quite Arkingthaad-Lander-Tower-Large, but definitely within shouting distance. The wheel assembly I have planned out in my head, but we'll see how it actually handles. But right now the main chassis has my full attention. It has to be particularly robust; I will be putting significant weight on the wheel assemblies, and it won't do to have a flimsy chassis.

I will say that I'm building it with the expectation of it being able to land itself. And refuel, a' la Kethane. Three separate ambulatory systems... wheels, landing engines, transplanetary drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...