Diagonal fuselages and structural fuselage struts

[theend3r]

1) Diagonal fuselages

Who never wanted to mount a quadcoupler on a quacoupler? Well a 2,5m to a 2,5m coupler would be obviously too big and would find little to no use but this could be solved by diagonal parts. Unfortunately we have none.

Of course it's solvable by making various workarounds but that only increases the part count, wobbliness and ugliness of the craft. Another solution could be some variation of the following:

2) Structural fuselage struts

I understand that it's a limitation of the engine using a hierarchic part structure which doesn't allow connecting two parts by more than one connection. But then there are struts and fuel ducts, so why not use the same principle with procedural versions of some parts e.g. structural fuselages or girders? They would offer more rigid connection and better looks in exchange for heavier weight and would have enabled collisions.

[Strikerklm96]

I, along with many others would love to see procedural fuel tanks, girders, ladders, ect. have you seen this thread? : http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/51390-Procedural-Parts-%28The-best-way-to-improve-the-game-experience-%29