Guest Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 (edited) This will be the development thread for Component Space Shuttle. Due to terrible luck this project had before, I decided that more public development is in order. Test versions will be more frequently updated than release, but might contain bugs and balance issues. Also, the flight procedures are yet to be devised, which means you'll have to figure them out yourself. As usual with development versions, everything is subject to change at any time, for any reason.Master Link:http://www./download/f2f6ywszsehylud/CSS.ZIPCurrent version: 6.0.3-XRSS Version:WIPLicense: All parts shipped in the mod are free to use, but proper attribution is required for each part. See credits for the list. You only have to credit people involved with a particular part when redistributing it. This license does not apply if a dependency that has a separate license gets temporarily shipped with this mod for some reason. In this case, the details will be noted here.Requirements:Space Shuttle Engines by Dtobi [included]: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/55985Engine Thrust Controller by HoneyFox (link from his signature, no release thread) [included]: https://www.dropbox.com/s/hb51rhkgdz814nl/Engine%20Thrust%20Controll%20V2.zipRomfarer's Lazor System, or any "lite" pack with his plugin: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/9923-0-23-Lazor-System-v32b-%28Dec-19%29Firespitter by Snjo: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/24551-Firespitter-propeller-plane-and-helicopter-parts-v6-3-%28May-6th%29-for-KSP-0-23-5?p=1222092&viewfull=1#post1222092Changelog from 6.0.2-XTextures modified, courtesy of Dolin.Sounds by Nazari1382.RPM updated.Bundled a number of (rarely updated) plugins.Reduced amount of dependencies, streamlined the .craft file. It's very basic now.Many small changes in order to ensure 0.25 compatibility and clean the Shuttle up.Changelog from 6.0.1-X:Major overhaul: Firespitter-based animations and landing gear.ModuleRCSFX-based RCS in the engine block, to allow roll control.Removed Shuttle-NRO.craft, replaced by a simpler Shuttle-gantry (easier to maintain).Added RPM-based IVA. Still WIP.Experimental texture switching added, currently only works on wings.Changed the booster back the the old version and added Squad's FX to them. The result is much better performance than on SmokeScreen-based ones.RealChute-based drogue parachute (no dedicated model yet).Changelog from 6.0.0-X:Updated ET - now the correct size.Updated SRBs - now with custom particles and completely new models, courtesy of Piwa and 1096Bimu.Updated .craft files - replace the ones you have.Added a new SRB nosecone and separation motors.Added SRB smoke and particles - now needs Smokescreen plugin.Removed SSME smoke - it's not present on the real thing, either.Changelog from 5.0.1:-Reconverted all models and restructured the folder for memory efficiency.-Reworked flight model, it behaves much better now.-Balanced the COM with RCS placement.-Fixed RCS nozzles - now they all fire properly.-Split the crew section into airlock and crew cabin proper.-Split the control surfaces from the wings and tailfin.-Animated the tailfin as landing gear. It now works as an airbrake. -Fixed the landing gear, this time for good (finally!).-Added proper angling to OMS engines (the straight engine retained for use on other ships).-Replaced Tiberion's SSME cluster with the new SSMEs by Dtobi.-Added roll control to all engine gimbals.-Added new effects to OMS and SSMEs engines.-Changed Isp of all engines to better suit the purpose of the Shuttle.-Added reaction wheels similar to those on Buran.Known issues:-Inverted lighting on airlock (no workaround, fix known and WIP).-Airlock's dockport does not work (workaround: place a functional port on top, fix known and WIP).-Body flap nonfunctional (no workaround, fix known and WIP).-On certain parts of the Shuttle, things surface attached to it hover a short distance from the hull (workaround: use parts that normally extend into the mesh, fix known).-"Pitch trim" option on the OMS engines trims yaw (no fix planned, you can now trim both axes, so just remember they're swapped).-Downward RCS plumes on the nose clip through the mesh, visual only (no workaround, no planned fix).-The arm interface says "Buran Cam" (no workaround, no known fix).-Cryogenic effects on SSMEs are offset (intended behavior, the effect is being refined).Credits and thanks:Rocket2Guns - Original model and textures.Ledenko - Complete model overhaul, re-conversion and Unity rigging.BobCat - SRBs, their nosecones, CanadArm model and Buran, from which I borrowed many technical solutions (yes, I'm aware of the irony ).Dolin - Converting the new IVA to KSP from Orbiter, name textures for each Shuttle Orbiter.Dtobi - SSMEs, gimbal plugin.Nazari1382 - SSME and OMS effects, sounds.Dragon01 - Configs, team management since 6.0 alpha and modification of Buran's arm texture with a proper wordmark.JordanCox - SRB decoupler textures (new model, but old textures. I still hope to soon make this one a HM ).Cepheus - Configs and management up to 6.0 alpha version. First came up with the idea of resurrecting the mod (honorable mention).Tiberion - Old SSMEs and old gimbal plugin, no longer inluded in the pack (honorable mention).Wikipedia - CanadArm wordmark.Squad - KSP.1096Bimu - New SSRB model (now defunct, HM).Piwa - SSRB nosecone, decoupler and separation motors (now defunct, but thanks, HM).Release thread:http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/8428-Component-Space-Shuttle-V-5-0-1-%28July-14-2013%29If you're not in for bugtesting, then this is the latest stable version. Might be horribly outdated, so be careful.Future plans/wishlist: -Fix all known issues that we can fix.-Cargobay radiator panels.-New fuel dump valve.-New OMS engines.-Texture overhaul.-More plugins supported.-Real-scale version for RSS.-New SRB decoupler.-Further Firespitter-based refinements to the Shuttle. -Better IVA props. Edited November 21, 2014 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 (edited) CSS Community Payload ProjectSpace Shuttle payloads were diverse, and there was a lot of them. From PAM-D and IUS, to Spacelab, LACROSSE and Hubble, as well as most of the ISS. Because of that, I'm opening the CSS Community Payload Project. I'll accept submissions for any payload that flew on a Shuttle, be it a cubesat or a whole-bay lab. I can also provide technical data and other support if needed. A few guidelines on them: 1. There's a node on the rear face of the Shuttle's payload bay. Large payloads should generally attach in there, or to the airlock node on the front.2. IVAs are not required for manned parts, but nice. It should come in two versions: 64% scale (to fit with the "Kerbal" Shuttle variant) and 100% scale (for the RSS version).3. Parts should also come in two scales, as there will be two versions of the pack. I can rescale and reconfig a submission if it's only provided in one version, but it's preferable to have both.4. The "Kerbal" Shuttle can lift about 10T, less if going to higher orbits or performing complex missions. The 64% payload shouldn't weigh more. Real-scale versions should, of course, weigh as much as they really did.5. ISS parts should generally be submitted to ISS Community Project, but I will accept them, especially if modeled with a realistic mounting interface. Generally though, I'd rather add the ISS parts themselves to ICP, while keeping the interfaces here.6. Fictional payloads (including unflown ones) are allright, but will probably get a separate pack. The most likely ones (like Centaur G and PAM-A) could get included into the primary pack, though.7. The airlock is technically a payload, so if anyone can design a better one that what is currently included in the CSS, it'll go here, too.8. There's no such thing as "excessive quality". If it works in KSP, it can go in, not matter how many polies. Likewise, it can depend on any working plugins. Download:No submissions yet.License: Unless on a special request, refer to the main license. Edited March 3, 2014 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 (edited) Shuttle on launchpad. Payload is a classified National Reconnaissance Office spy satellite.Tower camera, just before liftoff.Payload bay, showing the spy satellite.Mid-tower camera.Ground camera, showing off the Shuttle's engines.View from the ET camera.SSME ignition.Liftoff!Flight nominal, view from the bottom of ET.SRB camera.Approaching SRB burnout.SRBs jettisoned. It happens too fast to catch a good shot.Just before a big pitchover.Pitching over for orbital insertion.ET camera, showing another pretty view.Raising Ap to target altitude.MECO! The ET detaches and the Space Shuttle translates up to clear it.Flight nominal so far.Bay doors open, circularizing.NRO satellite ready for deployment.The satellite is grabbed by CanadArm and rotated to a position where it can safely move out of the bay.Agena's engine bell closeup, the satellite is close to proper position.Spy satellite erected, ready for release.The satellite is clear of the bay and has opened it's panels. It will soon begin operation.Preparing for reentry.Deorbited, heading for reentry.Reentry. It doesn't really heat up much, unless returning from about 300km.Entering a sharp dive before KSC.Shuttle final approach.Touchdown!Mission successful. Edited March 3, 2014 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoubleOSeven1 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 yes finally! Will get to testing ASAP!Oh btw are you aware of the possible spelling error in the title? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daemoria Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 The inverted lighting on the airlock sounds like reversed face normals, fairly easy to fix that. This project looks promising, I await more shiny pictures.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 There you go. Also, if you use Space Shuttle-NRO.craft (it's the one set up for pretty pictures), keep in mind that tower cameras have a penchant for falling off. Dunno how to keep them all attached, taking those pics took multiple attempts. Also, the battery capacity has been bumped since they were taken (using the fuel cell is not advised due to limited fuel on board). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sochin Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 First of all nice on to the whole team to get this mod back up and running, I have a few observations.1. SRB's are a royal pain in the ass to place correctly with the decouplers.2. Part files are not set up for 0.23.3. SRB effects are not the nicest to behold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 1. Yeah, I know. I'd like to replace the decouplers.2. What do you mean? They are definitely set up for 0.23, taking advantage of MODEL nodes, for instance. If you mean lack of tech tree, that's planned (should probably edit that in).3. If you can make better ones, go right ahead, I'll add them and credit you. Nazari could not do that. There's no way that we know of to make proper smoke (or even force a custom effect to use stock SRB smoke), which is essential to the SRBs and could not be replaced using custom effects. There's a plugin in the works dedicated to all sorts of smoke, and once that's done, we'll get new SRB effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasmic Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 I should try this out, soon. Does anybody know how it flies with FAR, or do I need to experiment with that myself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sochin Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 1. Roger on the decouplers, may I suggest that you apply a node to the exterior of the fuel tank.2. Tech tree integration was what I was on about and acknowledge your remarks about future development.3. Acknowledge your remarks and await the pluggin.I got a decent landing in on manual and it glides rather well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasmic Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 I got a decent landing in on manual and it glides rather well.Is that a response to my comment, or just a general remark on the Shuttle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sochin Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 No I haven't tried it yet with FAR, just a general landing under stock parameters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thesonicgalaxy Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 (edited) Beautiful. Edited June 30, 2014 by Thesonicgalaxy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtualgenius Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Tested this out its really good so here are some pics for you messed up the landing overshot the runway but landed on the grass landing pics omitted due to embarrassmentJavascript is disabled. View full album Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piwa Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 why do not you use SSSRB from 1096bimu??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorchdestroya Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Any chance for an SCA? I know Bobcat was working on an AN-225 but I think we could use a NASA one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasBananenbrot Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Any chance for an SCA? I know Bobcat was working on an AN-225 but I think we could use a NASA one.He is not yet finished with the reworking of the shuttle and you already suggesting a new thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 (edited) Nice pics, as for the vid, use struts. It really needs them, such a powerful craft isn't gonna fly without additional reinforcement. If you looked at the .craft files, they're strutted quite extensively. BobCat's Buran is no different in that regard, though it's got (somewhat) better load distribution.I got a decent landing in on manual and it glides rather well.Yeah, I'm happy with it's flight model. It's somewhat forgiving, but good enough not to scare new players off, I think. Due to stock aerodynamics being what they are, it's rather hard to force it to approach and land at a very high speed. The future FAR version should be closer to reality in that regard.I should try this out, soon. Does anybody know how it flies with FAR, or do I need to experiment with that myself?It doesn't; wings have no FAR code and won't work properly. I'm gonna work on that soon, when making the RSS version of the Shuttle.why do not you use SSSRB from 1096bimu???Because they have no nosecone and the author was banned, rendering future support questionable. With BobCat, I have no such fears. Edited March 3, 2014 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thesonicgalaxy Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Nice pics, as for the vid, use struts. It really needs them, such a powerful craft isn't gonna fly without additional reinforcement. If you looked at the .craft files, they're strutted quite extensively. BobCat's Buran is no different in that regard, though it's got (somewhat) better load distribution.Seems kinda silly that the .craft file wouldn't already be struted, but whatever. Should probably include some sort of note in a readme or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CluelessModeler Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Love it! Haven't needed struts... Flies just fine the way it comes for me! (If you got all of the plugins)Able to get to orbit pretty easily, and even did an Abort RTLS with it. Pretty interesting!Good job Dragon01 and co-conspirators! You've done this mod more justice than I ever could have!Now if only I could find enough time to make some payloads for this thing... Hmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thesonicgalaxy Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 (edited) Love it! Haven't needed struts... Flies just fine the way it comes for me! (If you got all of the plugins)Able to get to orbit pretty easily, and even did an Abort RTLS with it. Pretty interesting!Good job Dragon01 and co-conspirators! You've done this mod more justice than I ever could have!Now if only I could find enough time to make some payloads for this thing... Hmm...So what then, mine just was like "Screw you!" and just didn't want to fly?EDIT: Just go ahead and change that to doesn't. No matter what i do this shuttle just does not want to fly. It just keeps spinning in circles until it falls apart. Edited March 4, 2014 by Thesonicgalaxy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtualgenius Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 So what then, mine just was like "Screw you!" and just didn't want to fly?EDIT: Just go ahead and change that to doesn't. No matter what i do this shuttle just does not want to fly. It just keeps spinning in circles until it falls apart.Maybe we can help you if you give us more info1) Are you using FAR 2)Did you download and install the requirements and the recommendations 3)Where did you install the engine thrust pluggin ( A suggestion would be to place it in the css folder)4) Did you lock any of the gimballing as its not a good idea 5)Did you set the trim and the engine speed 6) Do you use MJ7) Do you let the engines reach full power before releasing the clamps, the main engines should be running before you fire the srbs and release the clampsIf you can answer some of the questions we may be able to resolve it I have had a dozen launches and everyone a success Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piwa Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Because they have no nosecone and the author was banned, rendering future support questionable. With BobCat, I have no such fears.1.1.I made ​​his version of the fairing and it is good, I can give it to you if you want2. Autor allowed SSSRB include other add-ons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtualgenius Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 You seem to be rather a big fan of that particular SRB are you by chance the author or know him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thesonicgalaxy Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Maybe we can help you if you give us more info1) Are you using FAR 2)Did you download and install the requirements and the recommendations 3)Where did you install the engine thrust pluggin ( A suggestion would be to place it in the css folder)4) Did you lock any of the gimballing as its not a good idea 5)Did you set the trim and the engine speed 6) Do you use MJ7) Do you let the engines reach full power before releasing the clamps, the main engines should be running before you fire the srbs and release the clampsIf you can answer some of the questions we may be able to resolve it I have had a dozen launches and everyone a successI think I found my problem, thanks for the help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts