Jump to content

High Performance Electric Aircraft Propulsion


Nuke

Recommended Posts

There are a lot of pipes, though. And I'm not sure what you mean by "purely space". Once in orbit, definitely. During ascent? I'm not so sure.

I'm really annoyed at atmosphere. Especially that property where at certain altitude it's of no help, but it's still too thick to accelerate without losses. I really wish there was something we could do about that. Then we wouldn't need any fancy propulsion or power sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By then, hopefully, you have most of your orbital speed, and TWR isn't much of an issue, anyhow. Like I said, it does look good for orbital applications. But building an actual ascent rocket with it would have been more exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EHD thruster are very efficient. I found a source citing 68N/kW, with 100MW, that would mean 6800kN of thrust in the lower atmosphere. Once out of the atmosphere, they can either be used as crappy ion drives, or left alone since they don't weight much.

http://lae.mit.edu/uploads/LAE_report_series/2012/LAE-2012-008-T.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...