Jump to content

RCS based Mun lander 100% stock


Cezary

Recommended Posts

Kind of you to give me a shout-out at your blog.

That\'s the slowest launch I\'ve done in a while! - I am typing this as your Ascento is, well, ascending. You should try to be at ~ 100 m/s by 1000m and accelerating for fuel efficiency, so I would suggest some SRBs on the first stage.

(Later):

Well I crashed on the Mun - not enough fingers to hold down the H, F, and other keys - but had a lot of fun with this craft.

Thanks for sharing it, and it was a good way to advertise your blog which I\'ll be checking into more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my... When I posted this, the Ascento was my primo ship. A mere half a day later I have already made several generations more and feel like Ascento was a rickety pile of bolts. How very Kerbal of me...

By the way, not sure if you\'re using the \'F\' key out of choice or you don\'t know about the \'T\' key. I played KSP for a month before realizing I didn\'t have to hold the \'F\' key the whole time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Busy day. Cooking and cleaning left little time for KSP, and by that I mean I did a Mun mission without using time warp while I cooked and cleaned. I find that I am EXTRA careful when it took eight and a half hours to reach the surface of the Mun.

Back to the topic at hand... The successor to Ascento has arrived. The boringly named RCS Probe is ready to scour the Mun for landing sites and mountain tops. Complete with 3 RCS tanks and 36 RCS thrusters, you\'ll be able to cover a nice area.

Check it out here

h2m9k.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I suggest this for an alternate lander/ Mun hopper?

20j68mq.png

3RCS tanks, and 1 stack decoupler (mass 0.8) instead of 3 radial decouplers (total mass 1.2). I only put 18 RCS thrusters on this example but you could go for more - not sure that more are needed in the Mun\'s gravity though.

When done with hopping around using the fins and bottom RCS tank, you can leave them behind and return to Kerbin with the 2 RCS tanks remaining.

Just a suggestion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Efficiency wasn\'t my main priority the first time around. I focused on impact tolerance (the 3x decouplers + winglets can take a big hit) and lots of thrust for quick maneuvers (thus the 36x thrusters). I also had no intention of returning the Probe to Kerbin; Apologies to Bill, Jeb and Bob.

Once we get not only persistence, but docking as well I plan to create a Mun shuttle/lifter that lands on top of cargo, attaches, and moves it elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also had no intention of returning the Probe to Kerbin; Apologies to Bill, Jeb and Bob.

Oh, OK! How did I not notice that? Or the lack of parachute when I did return to Kerbin! (I almost made a controlled landing with the remaining RCS fuel, which I had saved from not hopping around a lot).

With all those RCS thrusters it was a very fast return from the Mun as well compared to what I\'m used to.

Users will have a lot of fun with this craft, as I did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...