Serious don't forget Hugos work alarm. (Mk. 3 parts)

[blspblackdeath]

I was watching Maxmaps preview for 0.25 and enjoying the new spaceplane+ parts, when it struck me.

Over the implementation of the Sp+ parts they seem to have forgotten to put Hugos new Mk.3 parts into the game.

As you can see in the video the partstab with the cockpits does show the old Mk. 3 ugly shuttle cockpit.

So as a reminder that you had an intern once who made cool new Mk.3 parts, don't forget to put them in 0.25!!!

Edited October 3, 2014 by blspblackdeath

[Mach_XXII]

They moved to the 0.26 release to put more work into them

I hope that means cargo bays

Edited October 3, 2014 by Mach_XXII

[Madrias]

I hope their decision to move them to the 0.26 release means both Cargo Bays and Working IVA views. Am I really the only spaceplane pilot who wants to see why my Kerbals are always screaming?

[blspblackdeath]

Ah, ok I missed that they moved them to 0.26. My bad.

[klgraham1013]

This is surprising to me. I thought we heard that Hugo left after his project was done. Either way, Mk3 needed an overhaul even more than Mk2, in my opinion.

[TimberWolffe]

what's annoying to me is that in a stock 0.24.2 game I still have some SP+ parts, those being a Mk. 3 to S2 adapter, an S2 to Mk. 1 adapter, and an S2 fuselage, however the parts don't at all fit together well and it makes it look terrible. So yeah, Mk.3 tail parts and bigger wings pls

[mike9606]

what's annoying to me is that in a stock 0.24.2 game I still have some SP+ parts, those being a Mk. 3 to S2 adapter, an S2 to Mk. 1 adapter, and an S2 fuselage, however the parts don't at all fit together well and it makes it look terrible. So yeah, Mk.3 tail parts and bigger wings pls

Do you mean the Sp+ MK2 fuselages or the B9 S2 fuselage system?

[TimberWolffe]

Do you mean the Sp+ MK2 fuselages or the B9 S2 fuselage system?

Mk2 fuselages

[Alshain]

This is surprising to me. I thought we heard that Hugo left after his project was done. Either way, Mk3 needed an overhaul even more than Mk2, in my opinion.

How can you overhaul something that didn't exist? Seriously Mk2 was a jet fuel tank, 2 adapters, and a cockpit that wasn't in the proper form factor (it was an inline Mk1, not a Mk2). It needed just as much work as Mk 3 does.

Edited October 3, 2014 by Alshain

[CalculusWarrior]

MK 3 cargo bays (especially if they could hold 2.5 m parts) would make my day. Finally, we could build space shuttles which can carry cargo!

of course, nothing's confirmed yet... :/

[KasperVld]

MK 3 cargo bays (especially if they could hold 2.5 m parts) would make my day. Finally, we could build space shuttles which can carry cargo!

of course, nothing's confirmed yet... :/

The Mk 2 parts are already very capable of carrying the 1.25m parts as cargo..

http://i.imgur.com/uAY2bK3.jpg

[Renegrade]

The Mk 2 parts are already very capable of carrying the 1.25m parts as cargo..

http://i.imgur.com/uAY2bK3.jpg

CalculusWarrior was asking about 2.5m parts, silly. Kappa~

I'd definitely like to see cargo bay options across ALL lines (from 0.625 to 3.75, rockets and planes...)

By the way, any idea of what bugfixes might be included?

[TimberWolffe]

I wanna see something carrying 5m parts as cargo for SUPER HEAVY SPACE SHUTTLE LOLZ

[Franklin]

The Mk 2 parts are already very capable of carrying the 1.25m parts as cargo..

http://i.imgur.com/uAY2bK3.jpg

So did we ever get clarification on what those parts are between the solar strut arms and the lab modules?

edit: Actually, upon closer inspection they just look like jr. docks mashed into a probe core and two batteries, so maybe there is no mystery.

[klgraham1013]

How can you overhaul something that didn't exist? Seriously Mk2 was a jet fuel tank, 2 adapters, and a cockpit that wasn't in the proper form factor (it was an inline Mk1, not a Mk2). It needed just as much work as Mk 3 does.

Ok. It all needed work. ...but I still found a few uses for some of the Mk2 parts.

[KasperVld]

So did we ever get clarification on what those parts are between the solar strut arms and the lab modules?

edit: Actually, upon closer inspection they just look like jr. docks mashed into a probe core and two batteries, so maybe there is no mystery.

Yup, that's exactly it. I did reply to one person asking it before in another thread, but can't recall if that was you

[Giggleplex777]

MK 3 cargo bays (especially if they could hold 2.5 m parts) would make my day. Finally, we could build space shuttles which can carry cargo!

of course, nothing's confirmed yet... :/

Meanwhile, we'll have to stuff mk2 cargo bays into the mk3 shape:

[Alshain]

Meanwhile, we'll have to stuff mk2 cargo bays into the mk3 shape:

http://i.imgur.com/83o0tUM.png

Yeah, but that defeats the point since you can still only carry 1.25 parts. But that plane does look good.