Pulling Hard G's

[Pesoen]

here is the challange, you must get as hard G's as you possibly can.

here are the rules:

1. you may only use 1 engine(turbojet or basic jet engine only!)

2. you may not go higher than 8000 meters.

3. you must take off and land again, no crashing.

4. you have to post screenshot of vehivle and the flight report after landing(press f3 for the report)

5. Infinite fuel is NOT allowed.

6. STOCK PARTS ONLY!

7. FAR is allowed. any other mod is not allowed

good luck out there, here is my one, with my StuntPlane Mk5

Edited October 5, 2014 by Pesoen
forgot that rule, otherwise really easy to get high G's

[dbmorpher]

So no FAR?

[Pesoen]

So no FAR?

there, forgot to add this, since most people, have it, though i did it without it, so not sure how it would be with FAR, ill have to try it, and come up with a scoring system.

[Wanderfound]

there, forgot to add this, since most people, have it, though i did it without it, so not sure how it would be with FAR, ill have to try it, and come up with a scoring system.

You may want to have a look at this: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/93347-The-Vomit-Comet-(YASPC)

[BagelRabbit]

The F3 Flight Results are a bit inaccurate. This post on this very-similar thread shows an attempt I made a while back, in which I pulled 315 g's. Since then, I've figured out how to regularly exceed 2,000 g's of force and land safely, with some slight modifications to the design shown on the thread. For some reason, though, the after-flight log inevitably shows G-forces way, way lower than the Double-C Accelerometer.

[Pesoen]

The F3 Flight Results are a bit inaccurate. This post on this very-similar thread shows an attempt I made a while back, in which I pulled 315 g's. Since then, I've figured out how to regularly exceed 2,000 g's of force and land safely, with some slight modifications to the design shown on the thread. For some reason, though, the after-flight log inevitably shows G-forces way, way lower than the Double-C Accelerometer.

hmm interesting, ill have to look into that, and see if i figure something out. or see a way to get accurate readings.