Jump to content

Beagle2 found


djnattyd

Recommended Posts

Ha! They got that close!

I always thought that solar array design looked flimsy... petals... pffft.

It's a shame the arrays are what caused it to fail, I think that's more disheartening than it just crashing.

To land within 5KM of the intended target is an achievement in and of itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ooooooooh that sucks. Hitting the bullseye like that only to fall to what is probably just bad luck.

as far as re-establishing contact goes: the article says that nothing can be done to bring the probe bck to life, so I wouldn't get my hopes up :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as far as re-establishing contact goes: the article says that nothing can be done to bring the probe bck to life, so I wouldn't get my hopes up :P

Yeah, just seen that. When i got the breaking news alert it originally said "More information to follow" and had nothing about contact being impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mind you, it's REALLY got to suck knowing that the solution to the problem would possibly (probably?) be trivial if only you could walk up to it and metaphorically give it a kick. But that's kinda hard when your probe is about 500 million kilometers away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember watching the news on landing day and the faces of the team when they realised they'd lost contact... You can practically hear the "Well this was a waste of time. I could be at home having Christmas dinner."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I would have preferred a small crater than coming so close.

I always thought that the petals seemed needlessly over complicated.

Pathfinder's pyramid layout looked less failure prone to me, but the shape they chose may have been limited to what the carrier would allow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mind you, it's REALLY got to suck knowing that the solution to the problem would possibly (probably?) be trivial if only you could walk up to it and metaphorically give it a kick. But that's kinda hard when your probe is about 500 million kilometers away.

You described pretty decently why doing Mars missions (or most space missions) is so incredibly hard. Something you can easily fix on Earth is a mission ending problem in space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we have any other asset on Mars that can possibly come over and do that metaphorical (possibly literal?) kick to the thing? Like the rover?

Opportunity and Curiosity are too far away to make the deviation from their own missions worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All we need now is for NASA to announce that Spirit has come back to life.

I demand that the first manned mission to Mars fixes Beagle2 and allows it to complete its mission.

NASA can send Mark Watney to fix it.

Do we have any other asset on Mars that can possibly come over and do that metaphorical (possibly literal?) kick to the thing? Like the rover?

The rechargeable batteries wear out and it's been over 11 years, I don't think it would ever hold a charge again and also 11 cold winters can possibly crack the electronic on that thing.

Edited by Tommygun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rechargeable batteries wear out and it's been over 11 years, I don't think it would ever hold a charge again and also 11 cold winters can possibly crack the electronic on that thing.

I am pretty sure the batteries are not the defining issue :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, just saying even if there was a rover near by with an arm like probe.

What I meant is that the batteries are not the primary mode of failure. Everything gets busted up by the harsh conditions on Mars, the batteries are only a minor issue.

Edited by Camacha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, just saying even if there was a rover near by with an arm like probe.

A planet is a big place and there are only two rovers. Plus, probes tend to explore very different areas instead of landing close to each other. It's like asking if there is someone in China who can come repair you dishwasher in Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even that's assuming there wasn't a major systems failure, when we've no evidence of that. Given the development issues with the airbags in particular, there's a good chance we're looking at the result of a bounce or a too-hard initial impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And even that's assuming there wasn't a major systems failure, when we've no evidence of that. Given the development issues with the airbags in particular, there's a good chance we're looking at the result of a bounce or a too-hard initial impact.

There appears to be a petal missing, which suggest a rough encounter at landing or afterwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There appears to be a petal missing, which suggest a rough encounter at landing or afterwards.

The missing petal isn't actually missing, the lander stopped operating during its deployment stage which resulted in the petal with the RF antenna on remaining in the closed position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...