RocketSquid Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 (edited) 3 hours ago, PB666 said: If they would bother to edit before next person posted, but they don't so, if they did it would already be 100, so, by that logic. Refresh, post, update, edit [if neccesary] . . . .easy but not so for the positives. Yup, right here. And 99+. Edited June 30, 2016 by RocketSquid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vysionone Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 (edited) 100+ on page 666!!! Edited June 30, 2016 by Vysionone More exclamation points for victory! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 2 minutes ago, RocketSquid said: You edited dozens of times. I can even go back and find the post where you recommended that everyone edit their posts if they get ninja'd. 97+, by the way. Yes but i notified of the error and gave people time to respond, read the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketSquid Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 A righteous victory, at long last!! Back to 0. 1 minute ago, PB666 said: Yes but i notified of the error and gave people time to respond, read the rules. After notifying you of your error you failed to correct it. Additionally, a number of your edits fell afoul of rule 8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaPaL Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Victory at last!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 2 minutes ago, RocketSquid said: A righteous victory, at long last!! Back to 0. After notifying you of your error you failed to correct it. Additionally, a number of your edits fell afoul of rule 8. Only the gameSYs can reset, The victory will be analyzed the edits will be analyzed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketSquid Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, PB666 said: Only the gameSYs can reset, The victory will be analyzed the edits will be analyzed. And in all likelihood, they will all be invalid regardless of side. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 4 minutes ago, RocketSquid said: A righteous victory, at long last!! Back to 0. After notifying you of your error you failed to correct it. Additionally, a number of your edits fell afoul of rule 8. Well by that logic the game has been offstep by 1 since around 42. I let that one pass, but this one making an edit after someone else has responded to the valid change should not be allowed to pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketSquid Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 I'm not coming back here... Too time consuming. Vale! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 1 hour ago, RocketSquid said: A righteous victory, at long last!! Back to 0. After notifying you of your error you failed to correct it. Additionally, a number of your edits fell afoul of rule 8. Many times i let the other side take the advantage, but in this specific case, nope, ya'll did not notify, I did and you took advantage of the edits. Sure I said edit, but I did not say you could edit indefinitely in the past without a tell. If you edited before anyone else has posted thats ok, but if you edit after the next person posts you should have stopped, particularly after someone said 'hey, dude, whats up' You posted a number, I don't know what it was, then you edited it to 87+, Vys's number was not in step, I posted then 86, he then changed to 88, he did not notify, I then next posted nope, this series is out of step, PB666 Cosmic Disentangler Members 713 3391 posts Location: Universe's piehole Posted 1 hour ago · Report post 1 hour ago, RocketSquid said: 88+ Nooe yall skipeed Based on his edit it was out of step when I posted and it was updated, then I refreshed and the number changed. Even you posted 88 plus that was the correct number, but it followed my number. 86 is the last valid number. rather than stopping and correcting ya'll proceeded as if you had done nothing. Its clearly in violation of the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Ok then, 85 (-) @RainDreamer, wouldn't it just be simpler if you change the rules to no edits at all? I mean, we can live, and things like this just take the fun out of it. It's tough to check, and can very easily turn into a he said/she said kind of thing. And I mean no one needs to edit their posts. I mean this is a game after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0111narwhalz Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 86(+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Plus, if you add a response in five minutes or so, and no one else has posted, the server merges the two replies. It seems to me that that's the kind of thing you're looking for. 85 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0111narwhalz Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 86+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Aaaaaah! Did not intend to those to merge. Nor this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 85(-) heehee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0111narwhalz Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 86+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 85(-) I could do this all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0111narwhalz Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 86+ I plan on doing this all day, except with less "-" and more "+" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Oh really? 85(-)! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0111narwhalz Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 86+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 85(-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0111narwhalz Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 86+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 85(-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0111narwhalz Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 86+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts