Jump to content

The Number War: Count to 100 or -100


RainDreamer

Recommended Posts

Wait! The way i look at 93 or 94 were the last valid you may have eduted values after that but thats allowing the other players to catch up to your changes, i have no idea wre you got 97 from. 

Edited by PB666
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 0111narwhalz said:

Don't you "yay" me, traitor.:sticktongue:

Traitor?! I don't like the sound of that. I switched sides because the positive side has ALL the medals of dishonor, AND I went to join in again only to find out that somebody from the positive side had a dubious encounter with the rules right then. So yeah I switched sides. Sorry. Glad you guys won though. That's genuine.

They did say they are in the process of reviewing the results 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, PB666 said:

Positives make too many errors when they play, they are very impulsive. 

19 minutes ago, Mycroft said:

I just want to be on the side that plays best and fairest, that's all. And no offense, but the positive side has not done so.

Y'do realize those are traits of the players, not the flag they fly, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mycroft said:

I just want to be on the side that plays best and fairest, that's all. And no offense, but the positive side has not done so.

From what i see, positive players shoot in numbers as fast as they can, a number, they tend not tonrefresh before posting or after, they assume that what they see on their screen is correct and then only check when its shouted to them. 

After being told to read the rules and to refresh  frequently. So here in the last round you see that around 93 a bunch of number were thrown out, i responded to a valid number 94 and posted 93, note that none of my ## posts were edited after that. Someone then quoted a reg that my number was not valid, while they went back and changed their numbers to make them appear valid, i said wait, but no they chrged ahead..... I think minus desreves a default victory because they have pulled this routine twice. They even posted multiple numbers in one post so that they seem, two or three minutes later that they were valid. A clock is right at least 2wice a day no matter how badly it works. But i myself did not have a chance to sort through this before they posted victory. 

8 minutes ago, RA3236 said:

Whoa whoa whoa! I've just checked the past two pages and while it is confusing, it is all right. We are at 100.

You did not see all the edits, that 100 is based on a number of questionable edits that were not allowed tomsort out, again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 0111narwhalz said:

Y'do realize those are traits of the players, not the flag they fly, right?

Unfortunately, they are.

@PB666 and @Mycroft positives have been fighting as fairly as possible. There are just so many of them that ninja'd posts occur. I'll let @Dman979 decide on this matter. Also everyone please calm down.

Forget that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RA3236 said:

Unfortunately, they are.

@PB666 and @Mycroft positives have been fighting as fairly as possible. There are just so many of them that ninja'd posts occur. I'll let @Dman979 decide on this matter. Also everyone please calm down.

Forget that.

No. 

 

6. In the case of the current number being incorrect due to intentional or unintentional misinformation/misinterpretation, a player must notify others of the error, and will have to find the last correct number and quote that post (for easier accuracy checking) and the game continues as normal from the last correct numberThe responsibility of finding errors falls on to players. If no one report the error following the procedure above, before the number reach 100 or -100, the win will still be awarded, the positive team if 100, negative team if -100 (unless declared invalid by a GM). Common sense apply here though. If someone intentionally jack up a ton of numbers at once and reach a winning number in just a few posts, that is way too obvious and won't count as a win. This rules apply for more subtle error

I translate that into if there is a question,mslow down and work out what the last correct post is, don't just start editing and deciding and storm to the end, that is decidely not fair. I know the adrenaline is up, but we just went through this once. The error was reported by both a+ an a - , insaid wait, nope they just storm ahead, clearly violated 6. If you read 7 it also means you read 6. Check the last 10 posts on 669. note the posts that had two numbers or were later edited and the time stamps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...